Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Harringay residents gather to support the 'Living Wightman' message                                                                       (Photo: Hugh Flouch)

Wightman Road is living again. 

With the traffic dramatically reduced as a result of the bridge works, this is a residential community reborn. 

A place where children play in the street, neighbours stop for a chat, families cycle safely through to Finsbury Park and that joggers and commuters can enjoy rather than endure.

For many of us, the idea of Wightman Road returning to a noisy, polluted traffic-clogged rat-run is unthinkable.

The peace today brings into sharp focus the nightmare that its residents have long suffered as a result of decades of planning decisions that have seen their needs come second every time to those of drivers using their home as a rat run.

Wightman Road is, unquestionably, a residential road. Despite this, it was having a massively disproportionate share of local traffic dumped on it –120,000 vehicles a week – only 40,000 less than, Green Lanes. 

This level of traffic was generating dangerous levels of pollution, with children most at risk. Levels of nitrogen dioxide - a pollutant that inflames the lungs, stunts growth and increases the odds of respiratory diseases such as cancer and asthma – were much higher than EU legal limits.

Given the high proportion of deprived households on Wightman Road, some of the poorest children in Harringay were paying the price for those motorists who were using it as a rat run. 

As such, Wightman Road represents in microcosm a wider divide in Harringay, which sees poorer residents suffer for the convenience of their wealthier neighbours.  While 62% of households in our ward don’t have a car, ownership is high in surrounding areas such as Crouch End and Muswell Hill. 

We should no longer tolerate this injustice, and we must not ignore this daily threat to the health of our community, and our children. 

One of the first things that the new London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, did when he took office last month was to publish a major report on air quality. He also said nothing should be off limits when it came to tackling the issue. 

He said: “Half a million under-19s in London are breathing in air in breach of NO2 levels. Separate from that, we know the air in London is responsible for 10,000 deaths last year and in parts of London children have under-developed lungs.” 

But it’s not just lethal traffic pollution on Wightman Road that was a problem.

This traffic included foundation-shaking, thunderous lorries and HGVs that breach the tonnage limit with impunity. The bridge-strengthening works will give the green light for even heavier vehicles.

And more traffic will be generated by an estimated 7,500 new households created by the massive residential developments in the immediate and surrounding areas – including at  Hawes & Curtis, Wightman Road Hornsey Station, Heartlands sites,  Smithfield Square on Hornsey High Street and  Tottenham Hale. Whilst we support the building of more affordable homes, it’s important to recognise that Harringay will  accommodate a disproportionately high level  of new housing in the borough. Wightman Road and the Ladder are right in the middle of all this development.

So when the bridge works finish in September, we won’t be going to back to how it was. It’s going to get worse.

So it’s in everyone’s interests that we act NOW to stand up for the quality of life of local residents, particularly children who face stark health inequalities, on Wightman Road and the surrounding area.

This is the aim behind Living Wightman; a group of residents who have come together to campaign for a safer, healthier and happier future for Wightman Road and the rest of the Ladder roads and, in doing so, inform a major initiative that Haringey Council is currently leading to address the traffic problems that have blighted Harringay for years.

In doing so, we are acutely aware of the concerns of businesses that have been affected by the current restrictions, particularly with the closure of the Alroy Road end, and congestion generated elsewhere and of the inconvenience experienced by residents in and around the Ladder.

Mindful of this, we are asking for the following:

Firstly, we’re requesting that Haringey Council extend the current arrangements beyond summer to allow time to find a long-term solution that drastically reduces traffic on Wightman Road. It isn’t practical to completely open and then limit traffic on Wightman. It would reproduce the initial chaos we all suffered when a change in access was first put in place.

Secondly, we’re proposing that any long-term solution allows access for local businesses and their customers, but stops Wightman Road being used a rat run through route as part of overall measures to improve traffic flow in the surrounding area.

Thirdly, in the meantime, we want to encourage even more people to take advantage of a safer, healthier, quieter Wightman Road, especially cyclists to use it as an alternative to Green Lanes as a route to Central London . We also want residents to share their experiences and ideas about how we can build on these gains and go forward.

There will be those who say it can’t be done.

You only have to look at access restrictions in the Gardens roads, on Hermitage Road and Harringay Road to see that this is not the case.

There will be those who say that the surrounding areas can’t cope with the displaced traffic.

The current situation, with congestion at times, at certain pinch points , is certainly far from ideal, but we know that there has been a drop in car journeys as a result of Wightman Road no longer being used as a rat run.

Anecdotally, many residents also report walking, cycling and using public transport more and, if they have cars, using them more thoughtfully – for example, running errands as part of one journey rather than making lots of short trips.

This decline in car use can only help ease congestion in the long-term and be welcome if the Council is serious about meeting its ambitious aim of reducing carbon emissions by 40% in just four years.

But there is no question that we are anti-car. Many of us are motorists. Rather that the Living Wightman campaign is pro-people and communities.

The current arrangements on Wightman Road – for example, pavements in terrible condition impassable to wheelchairs and buggies in some places because of cars parked on the pavement rather than the road, are about as anti-people as you can get.

They are unsafe, potentially in breach of equalities laws and prioritise the rights of people using the road as a rat run over those who live there.

This cannot be right and is totally unfair.

We only want for our children and quality of life what our neighbours in places where this has been made a priority are getting without question.

No residential road should have 120,000 cars, vans and lorries roaring past people’s homes every week

No  child should have  their health put at risk and their lives cut short by dangerous levels of pollution

As we are seeing now, in a safer, healthier, happier Wightman Road, there is a better way for Harringay .

So let’s be ambitious and imaginative in striving for this together.

What can you do?

To find out more,  get involved, tell us what you think, share your ideas, please get in touch. You can:

Tags for Forum Posts: traffic, wightman bridge, wightman bridge closure

Views: 6636

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The drop is because the traffic can't flow, not bcos of behavioural change
Well, and this is only my view, either vehicles go or parking does. We have the ludicrous situation now where you are siting on the bus, you can see the inside lane empty apart for a parked vehicle a few streets down, and none of the traffic uses the inside lane because they know they'll have to pull back into the traffic at some point.
The argument, that shops die unless people can park outside of them, has been disproved in study after study which all show that foot passengers visits shops more frequently than car drivers do and so spend more money. The end of each of the roads leading to GL on both sides are ripe for pay and display and blue badge parking for those who really do need a car or are carrying out deliveries.

No, Haringey have done almost nothing to make not using a car attractive. The borough like most London boroughs is car sick. Residential areas are rat runs, there is no cycling infrastructure, bus priority is patchy, and so on. 

And actually it isn't a minority one at all. Car usage isn't the majority default in London, and certainly not in Haringey. 

 " there are plenty of local shops offering the same goods "

But more expensively. And who has the time to go from butcher to baker to greengrocer to newsagent to fishmonger to hardware shop to clothes shop when you can get them all under one roof ?

But that is based on only people very local to Green Lanes using Sainsburys, which I doubt is the case.

What interests me Michael is..

When you you use the bus, how far do you usually travel? Manor House? Finsbury Park? Nag's Head? Newington Green?  or even further?

Is your bus journey usually the complete journey? Part of a journey with just one change? Part of a journey with more than one change?

Do you continue your journey by Underground or Rail because they are faster? or more reliable? Or do they bring you closer to your destination?

If the surface method of transport were more reliable, would you use that as a preference?

Depends on the journey but I'll do anything to avoid using the tube (a bit of a phobia). My first choice for longer distances is the overground, then the bus and finally the tube.

The importance of bus services along Green Lanes for a lot of people though is to connect with either Manor House or Turnpike Lane I suppose. If I really have no option I tend to walk to Manor House via the park (because it's pleasant)

It was clearly a bad mistake not to put a Piccadilly line tube station at the Salisbury.  That would really make a difference.

Yes, but if the station was positioned slightly to the south with an exit at both ends - good interchange with the Overground GOBLIN service would be acheived. Both stations could then be called 'Harringay'  (which is where they are) and the other Harringay station could re-named (again) as Harringay West or Harringay Ladder .. The first station in the U.K. to use the name Ladder. 

@Michael: Bus lanes are so 1970s and in fact, so are buses.

There really needs to be a concerted effort to move Public Transport away from Diesel operation.

I am playing around with different ideas in my head as to whether a tram service Waltham Cross (Branch) & Enfield (Branch) via the Great Cambridge Road and Turnpike Lane should then continue via Green Lanes to 1/ Manor House 2/ Finsbury Park 3/ or continue further towards central London.

If you haven't already read it, Christian Wolmar'S piece on trams as a cleaner efficient form of public transport  from today's Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/jun/06/tram-cars-killed-effi...

I think the current in-out debate has forced him to use 'Swiss model' term rather than the general 'European' or 'German', 'French' or 'Spanish' even..

London's dependence on diesel fuelled public transport needs to be cut asap. Trams along Green Lanes would improve Harringay's environment no end. At the moment, it all sounds like a shot in the dark, pie in the sky, but I'm hoping that the new Mayor will be open minded about the re-introduction of trams in Greater London.

There are great examples of trams transforming places in the UK. Anyone who was in Manchester before and after the tram network will know what I mean. Picadilly used to be a traffic hell hole. Now it's a place where people meet up with friends and, on the rare day in doesn't rain in Manchester, socialise.
It is long term though Steven, and something I hope to see before I shuffle off to the retirement village in Bournemouth

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service