I have been on HoL for many years but I have been stunned recently by how many posts there have been on traffic and traffic related issues in the last 3-6 months. In terms of issues of the day for our community this is clearly huge!
I was just posting on a different thread and it occurred to me that we need to try to draw together some of our collective knowledge and experience in order to try to do more than collectively shout into the internet to vent our spleens.
As you may be aware the council have taken a pretty brave step in recognising the collective mismanament of our roads in the last 20 years. The sustainability of piecemeal closing or alteration of the road traffic network so that traffic is concentrated on an ever diminishing number of roads to the detriment of those communities and the political myopia (indeed active intervention) that has allowed Wightman Road to become a defacto trunk road has been highlighted by the closure over such a long term of the railway bridge on Wightman.
This is the issue the Green Lanes Traffic Study will aim to address. Its first Stakeholder Group meeting is to be help on Thursday 9th June. This is one of the forums through which residents will be able to feedback their views. There are several organisations that will be part of the Steering Group (see the Terms of Reference doc for the membership as of May, this may change). If you care about what is happening, you should feed your views in through the various members that may best represent your area, Gardens, Hermitage, Woodlands Park, Ladder, HoL, Wightman Rd, etc, or your councillor.
In the mean time I wanted try to do three things. I want to draw together people's experiences in order to:
1- Hear the anecdotal thoughts occurring to you.
2- Try to frame the myriad of problems, before and after the closure.
3- Identify solutions and ideas (however nutty)
In the ideas one or more of you will throw out will be part of the solution, and while the Stakeholder Group is not a decision making body, at least this is a forum where these ideas can be heard!
Tags for Forum Posts: harringay traffic study, traffic
It will go on the list. All ideas welcome.
One point I will make is think about the consequences and mitigation (as I tried to do with the example of the Traders above)...
Also bear in mind the fact the stretches of GL are regulated by TFL, not the council!
Yes, two sets of traffic lights less than 20 vehicle-lengths* apart at Salisbury Rd and St Ann's Road are one of the impediments along Green Lanes.
*I make it c. 100 metres. Chuck in a bus or two and a delivery lorry and the vehicle count goes down.
Good to get all the ideas gathered in one place.
Just to clarify on one issue. When I outlined the road pricing solution to you and the group as well as on my post about present-day turnpikes, it was one only possible application of the central idea which is 'electronic road barriering'.
Traffic management measures on other roads in the area suggest that physical road barriers are Haringey's preferred traffic reduction solution. What I'm suggesting is to update that methodology, so reducing the ongoing maintenance costs (such as exist in the Gardens) and to offer a much more flexible solution.
Automatic number plate recognition is currently used to manage parking in, for example Morrisons car parks. It wouldn't seem impossible for such a solution to be implemented on a contracted out basis for our local roads. It's at least worth talking to some of the operators of such systems to check out the economics.
An APNR system or similar could be used to create a total electronic barrier to all but residents and service vehicles, or it could be more flexible, for example allowing some level of access to all Harringay and Haringey residents, perhaps differentially. Once the system is in place any number of permutations would be possible.
It's been suggested to me that the cost wouldn't work on a such a small scale. Whilst that may ultimately prove to be the case, I'm far from convinced. If you sub-contract to an operator, like those who manage the Morrisons car parks, they already have most of the infrastructure and admin in place. The only additional cost would be installing the cameras (and that need only be the same number as the current number of concrete road blocks) along with any ongoing maintenance. Revenue levels from the Hewitt no-right-turn camera suggest that much, if not all, of the implementation cost could quickly be offset by enforcement fines. In the longer term, this may also prove to be sufficient or it may be expedient to introduce some from of road pricing to make it viable. The Gardens barriers could also be replace with a similar system with cost savings made there too.
If successful, the scheme would no doubt be replicated in other areas of the borough and across London and other cities. This would mean that, whilst Ladder residents might benefit as residents in Harringay, there may well be a downside when in the longer term we're penalised as rat runners in other areas. (Apologies to those who dislike the use of the term rat runner).
I'm sure that there are all sorts of complexities to be considered and, although the idea is new, it warrants serious consideration. It could be a great compromise solution allowing the savage road use of Wightman to be replaced with much more moderate road use, so reducing the congestion experienced during the road closure at the pinch-points, whilst respecting the health and wellbeing needs of residents.
Back in 1963 Harringay was pioneering another sort of traffic control. Perhaps it's time for us to step up to the plate again!
+1 on the Green Lanes red route - it's been mentioned before, as has the getting rid of car parking. Green Lanes north of the overground station is horrendous to cycle along.
When the Red Routes were proposed Green Lanes was in the frame.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh