Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!
Living Wightman: A safer, healthier, happier Harringay for everyone
Harringay residents gather to support the 'Living Wightman' message (Photo: Hugh Flouch)
Wightman Road is living again.
With the traffic dramatically reduced as a result of the bridge works, this is a residential community reborn.
A place where children play in the street, neighbours stop for a chat, families cycle safely through to Finsbury Park and that joggers and commuters can enjoy rather than endure.
For many of us, the idea of Wightman Road returning to a noisy, polluted traffic-clogged rat-run is unthinkable.
The peace today brings into sharp focus the nightmare that its residents have long suffered as a result of decades of planning decisions that have seen their needs come second every time to those of drivers using their home as a rat run.
Wightman Road is, unquestionably, a residential road. Despite this, it was having a massively disproportionate share of local traffic dumped on it –120,000 vehicles a week – only 40,000 less than, Green Lanes.
This level of traffic was generating dangerous levels of pollution, with children most at risk. Levels of nitrogen dioxide - a pollutant that inflames the lungs, stunts growth and increases the odds of respiratory diseases such as cancer and asthma – were much higher than EU legal limits.
Given the high proportion of deprived households on Wightman Road, some of the poorest children in Harringay were paying the price for those motorists who were using it as a rat run.
As such, Wightman Road represents in microcosm a wider divide in Harringay, which sees poorer residents suffer for the convenience of their wealthier neighbours. While 62% of households in our ward don’t have a car, ownership is high in surrounding areas such as Crouch End and Muswell Hill.
We should no longer tolerate this injustice, and we must not ignore this daily threat to the health of our community, and our children.
One of the first things that the new London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, did when he took office last month was to publish a major report on air quality. He also said nothing should be off limits when it came to tackling the issue.
He said: “Half a million under-19s in London are breathing in air in breach of NO2 levels. Separate from that, we know the air in London is responsible for 10,000 deaths last year and in parts of London children have under-developed lungs.”
But it’s not just lethal traffic pollution on Wightman Road that was a problem.
This traffic included foundation-shaking, thunderous lorries and HGVs that breach the tonnage limit with impunity. The bridge-strengthening works will give the green light for even heavier vehicles.
And more traffic will be generated by an estimated 7,500 new households created by the massive residential developments in the immediate and surrounding areas – including at Hawes & Curtis, Wightman Road Hornsey Station, Heartlands sites, Smithfield Square on Hornsey High Street and Tottenham Hale. Whilst we support the building of more affordable homes, it’s important to recognise that Harringay will accommodate a disproportionately high level of new housing in the borough. Wightman Road and the Ladder are right in the middle of all this development.
So when the bridge works finish in September, we won’t be going to back to how it was. It’s going to get worse.
So it’s in everyone’s interests that we act NOW to stand up for the quality of life of local residents, particularly children who face stark health inequalities, on Wightman Road and the surrounding area.
This is the aim behind Living Wightman; a group of residents who have come together to campaign for a safer, healthier and happier future for Wightman Road and the rest of the Ladder roads and, in doing so, inform a major initiative that Haringey Council is currently leading to address the traffic problems that have blighted Harringay for years.
In doing so, we are acutely aware of the concerns of businesses that have been affected by the current restrictions, particularly with the closure of the Alroy Road end, and congestion generated elsewhere and of the inconvenience experienced by residents in and around the Ladder.
Mindful of this, we are asking for the following:
Firstly, we’re requesting that Haringey Council extend the current arrangements beyond summer to allow time to find a long-term solution that drastically reduces traffic on Wightman Road. It isn’t practical to completely open and then limit traffic on Wightman. It would reproduce the initial chaos we all suffered when a change in access was first put in place.
Secondly, we’re proposing that any long-term solution allows access for local businesses and their customers, but stops Wightman Road being used a rat run through route as part of overall measures to improve traffic flow in the surrounding area.
Thirdly, in the meantime, we want to encourage even more people to take advantage of a safer, healthier, quieter Wightman Road, especially cyclists to use it as an alternative to Green Lanes as a route to Central London . We also want residents to share their experiences and ideas about how we can build on these gains and go forward.
There will be those who say it can’t be done.
You only have to look at access restrictions in the Gardens roads, on Hermitage Road and Harringay Road to see that this is not the case.
There will be those who say that the surrounding areas can’t cope with the displaced traffic.
The current situation, with congestion at times, at certain pinch points , is certainly far from ideal, but we know that there has been a drop in car journeys as a result of Wightman Road no longer being used as a rat run.
Anecdotally, many residents also report walking, cycling and using public transport more and, if they have cars, using them more thoughtfully – for example, running errands as part of one journey rather than making lots of short trips.
This decline in car use can only help ease congestion in the long-term and be welcome if the Council is serious about meeting its ambitious aim of reducing carbon emissions by 40% in just four years.
But there is no question that we are anti-car. Many of us are motorists. Rather that the Living Wightman campaign is pro-people and communities.
The current arrangements on Wightman Road – for example, pavements in terrible condition impassable to wheelchairs and buggies in some places because of cars parked on the pavement rather than the road, are about as anti-people as you can get.
They are unsafe, potentially in breach of equalities laws and prioritise the rights of people using the road as a rat run over those who live there.
This cannot be right and is totally unfair.
We only want for our children and quality of life what our neighbours in places where this has been made a priority are getting without question.
No residential road should have 120,000 cars, vans and lorries roaring past people’s homes every week
No child should have their health put at risk and their lives cut short by dangerous levels of pollution
As we are seeing now, in a safer, healthier, happier Wightman Road, there is a better way for Harringay .
So let’s be ambitious and imaginative in striving for this together.
What can you do?
To find out more, get involved, tell us what you think, share your ideas, please get in touch. You can:
- Email us at livingwightman@gmail.com
- Join our facebook group: Living Wightman
- Follow us on Twitter at @Living_Wightman
- Help us raise £500 to fund the Living Wightman campaign by making a donation at Just Giving Living Wightman.
Tags for Forum Posts: traffic, wightman bridge, wightman bridge closure
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Pat on
-
The number times that we have tried to cross at the pelican crossings only to have a car or bus in the way is ridiculous. I travel to work on the bus every day and since the Wightman Road closures it has taken much longer to travel from Iceland to Manor House. In the evenings it isn't even worth bothering in the opposite direction and I just get off at Manor House. It was not like this before the change.
-
Permalink Reply by matthew cuthbert on
-
This morning I actually saw school children crossing Wightman Road to get to school, normally hidden by traffic.
Green Lanes has claimed three generations of pedestrians in the last 5 years or so, so the 20 mph framework should help avoid further incidents. We need enforcement on speeding, and reduction in non local car journey,s to make London safer.
Public transport needs to be an econonic choice and a preferred choice. We need to rethink Harringay Bridge to Manor House, and St ann's to Turnpike Lane, to make it a more enjoyable pedestrian experience, along with improving conditions for residents who live over shops on Green Lanes. We can't keep the same level of vehicles on the road, it is simply unproductive.
-
Permalink Reply by matt on
-
A petition is a very good idea. Over here in the Netherlands at the moment and it's always wonderful to see how the Dutch do things. Every type or road user has a piece of the road, a piece of the action and there doesn't seem to be any arguments between them and that includes roads in older city centres too.
I've noticed that if there is a problem with road space a one way system seems to be the option chosen. Watching some of the smaller junctions in action in the narrower city centre streets is fascinating with so many different types of road users. They all look out for each other, there seems to be little selfishness so it works.
For our Green Lanes there may be a different way of doing things. Just not sure what. Yes, shoppers could be kept to parking in the side roads to free up the bus lanes all day & night. The problem is the deliveries; where do the loading zones go?
-
Permalink Reply by AndrewAW1 on
-
One way systems aren't looked on particularly favourably here. They tend to end up with more cars speeding and actually creating a less people-friendly environment. They are gradually being removed in a lot of places in London.
A similar issue may arise if parking is removed on Green Lanes. It may lead to more free-flowing traffic so that the cars actually form a bigger barrier between the two sides of the road than they currently do.
-
Permalink Reply by Michael Anderson on
-
You're right of course Andrew that better flowing traffic might have that impact. But I think the upsides outweigh that risk. So more reliable public transport providing a viable alternative to car use and lower levels of pollution by taking out some of the stop/start/crawl that has been a feature of Green Lanes for years.
-
-
Michael, I would argue that public transport in London, although expensive, is already very reliable. Green Lanes is particularly well served. From Iceland, I can get to most parts of London by bus. The tube is a short walk away and we have two train stations. Unless there is an outright ban on car use or enforced car poolling then I don't see how car use could be reduced. Some people will always choose to use the car, unfortunately, and it is a choice.
-
-
I agree that we are spoiled for choice as far as public transport goes. It's the reliability that is and has always been the problem. When I first moved here in the early eighties, 20 minutes plus from The Salisbury to Manor House on the 29 bus was not uncommon. In the thirty or so intervening years it hasn't got any better.
I really do think that if you felt pretty certain you could get from A to B in a predictable and reasonable amount of time, more people living locally would opt for a bus journey. The issue of non-local traffic is of course a different nut to crack and maybe there are two approaches. Get them in and out of the area as quickly and smoothly as possible or stop them going through in the first place. The second option is the harder of the two as it requires action way beyond the boundaries of Haringey, right up to the north circular.
-
-
Before the Wightman Road closure I could get the 29 bus in front of Iceland and be in Camden 35 min later. This journey is now taking up to an hour. Interestingly, traffic was much better last week during half-term but this morning traffic was very slow moving and backed up to Tesco. Personally, I don't think reliability of public transport is an issue as I am only late when there is a tube strike, resulting in buses being full by the time it reaches the Parade or there is an issue on Seven Sisters/Finsbury Park. However, I am only an N of 1.
-
-
Then the choice should really be restricted as much as possible. Not all roads should be through routes (only main roads and not residential). We also need to be improving the walking and cycling environment.
Perhaps the parking removal could be used for cycle tracks or bus lanes. I would prefer the latter as it would enable many journeys by bike.
-
-
It depends how you do one-way systems. It is a myth that two way is automatidcally better for people.
This is one example of doing it to prevent rat running: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNvV3qwWwAEaqJ1.jpg:large
-
Permalink Reply by Hugh on
-
This is my concern too Andrew. I'm sure it's one that could be addressed, and that it has been dealt with elsewhere, but it would need thinking through. Simply removing parking may have a negative effect overall. For me, it would need to be the removal of parking along with other measures to avoid the situation you describe.
-
-
Hence why I think that instead of adding lanes for cars it should be replaced with something relating to public transport or active travel.
© 2024 Created by Hugh.
Powered by
