FOLLOWING the break-ins to the Wireless Festival in June and July, the Council's latest events – in the weekend just passed – exhibited beefed-up security.
In addition to the hundreds of metres of steel wall that we've come to expect, watchtowers were erected at strategic locations.
These permit guards to spot attempts to break-in. All were built just inside the wall and the guards access them by ladders; all platforms allowed standing; at least one had the comfort of a chair.
Due to the earlier break-ins – and particularly the Facebook video (viewed some 3.5 million times) – I think it's fair to say that this north London park has achieved some notoriety. If there's a Wireless 2016, then I think security would have to be significantly toughened.
I don't imagine that the observation platforms will be weaponized, but I wonder if klaxons and searchlights might be considered to complete the security picture.
It's only a public park, after all.
click to enlarge
Haringey Councillor
Liberal Democrat Party
Tags for Forum Posts: finsbury park, finsbury park events, wireless festival
Matthew on the Sunday, I watched youths peering through the cracks, watching all the noise fun inside. I thought to myself, these youngsters can't afford to be in the Council-sanctioned event.
In terms of the the forthcoming Borough slogan "I am in", I would have to say that these youths were not in.
This was not an in-clusive or community event.
When he visited in the (destructive) wake of Wireless, one of the points that David Lammy MP picked up on quickly was how the wall acted as a barrier and was excluding.
I am in … to open access for parks.
Well Bee, there's much that could be said and has been said about Haringey Council's policy for events in FP, but the topic of the thread I began was the advent of the watchtowers. I walked past the event (not viewing it) and experienced the thump thump thump thump noise complained of by others.
I didn't see any litter pickers on Sunday or yesterday, but saw nine of them working this morning. I did feel sorry for them working in the rain.
It was worse for them as they had not been properly equipped. They were stooping to bend down and held a bag. At least some clearly had no gloves; they had no bag hoops and not a single one had been issued with a litter picker – surely this stuff is basic?
No matter how much litter they pick up, something they cannot do is repair the renewed damage to the park surface.
Litter is just one aspect of the Events: the southern area looks a mess.
By posting eleven pictures showing the same thing, the boundary wall is inevitably going to look hostile.
Pavlos I'm not sure that follows: 11 photos of a teddy bear need not look hostile at all, let alone inevitably so. I didn't mention "hostile". Do you think the steel wall and watchtowers look offensive?
I think the appearance is more of a defensive fortification, rather than something offering hostility. But still, in my view, inappropriate in a park.
It doesn't look hostile it IS hostile. I can't believe that parts of FP have been blocked of AGAIN!
This is just unreasonable!
Yup. Carnival has been completely 'spoilied' by the extreme and paranoid controls put in place to keep people in check. It is just so obvious that London needs a city-wide yearly celebration to let loose. Instead of increasing the controls they should be expanding the Carbnvial to other areas.
England has no national day when the entire country is allowed to 'let loose', make noise, dance in the streets and be happy TOGETHER a la 'Fete de la Musique' or 'Bastille Day'.
Every so often there is a Queens celebration of other when 'Englanders' show just how enjoyable and beneficial this can be.
Why the over-bearing paranoia and controls?
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh