After it was discovered at the St Ann's Labour Party selection candidate selection meeting that there were people present and voting who should not have been, I came home from the pub (where I'd heard about it) and wrote this article. It has subsequently been edited by site admins to remove the names of people who were embarrassed or in the final case where a journalist said it was potentially libellous. Well here I will attempt to summarise what we have subsequently found out and hopefully take people's attention away from my original appalling rant.
*An individual has asked that their name be replaced with their function in this post on the grounds that they are not seeking public office. This has been done.
Tags for Forum Posts: election2014, labour, st ann's labour, stanns
In view of the doubt over the legitimacy of the selection process, the obvious answer would be - don't vote for the " successful " candidates.
I'm sure there will be competent and hard-working LibDems and Conservatives, even Independents, up for election
Well overcoming the "brand" that the Labour party are currently topping up on the doorstep in Harringay (ridiculously talking about national issues for a local campaign) will be nigh on impossible so I would much prefer that the election was run again, without any ring ins.
As for "doubt" over the election result. There is no doubt whatsoever, it was rigged. The only people expressing any doubt are unwilling to so much as look at the evidence that David Browne has gathered.
We saw from John Blake's email which you posted that the latest wheeze is to try "creating facts" by pretending there was a proper investigation which found "there was no wrongdoing".
The assumption seems to be that this will now all fade away. It won't.
I liked your tweet to John Blake and Joe Goldberg, asking them if they thought I'd made all this up. To be fair to Joe, he is in the same position as I am. He won't have seen the St Ann's Labour Party branch membership list. Nor the smaller list of members eligible to take part in the Short-listing and Selection meetings. And certainly not the list of 26 people who actually attended the latter meeting. The only Haringey party members who have seen all three of those lists are John Blake the branch secretary and John Taylor the chair.
Did you like my belated recruitment of Marlon Brando in response to your tweets? According to the interpretation of the rules by the Labour Party London Region, not living in St Ann's ward and not being on the Electoral Register would be no bar to Brando joining St Ann's Labour branch. Or any other branch, come to that.
And I couldn't spot anything specific in the Party's rules about members not being dead. So probably that's okay as well. Provided that nobody challenges it at the meeting. Anyway, in the YouTube clip he looked more alive than almost all the current councillors.
(Tottenham Hale ward councillor till 2014)
I have tweeted Richard Bennett who was the person tasked with investigating the objections that Labour members in St Ann's raised. As far as I am aware not a single person who wrote in was contacted by him. So his investigation presumably consisted of confirming the result with the original officers running the election.
On 1 October Richard Bennett tweeted urging people to:
"Speak up for decency in British politics and add your name to Ed Miliband's".
I feel like I am harassing them now. I am asking questions on Twitter and seeing them tweet other things (so I know they get my message) but I get no response. Not even "talk to the hand".
One the other hand, one voting member of the meeting has written to all members of the GRA branding us all racist for taking issue with the selection process. I despair.
A legitimate member of the meeting and the branch. Somebody who lives in St Ann's rather than Lisson Grove, Winchmore Hill, Palmers Green, Seven Sisters or Harringay but who is nonetheless happy to have residents of Elsewhere choosing our councillor candidates.
Somebody who says if we complain, and point out a breach of rules of our own party, we are racist.
There needs to be a term like Godwin's Law for people who play this card.
Interesting. A member who was present and voted at the meeting has also replied in much the same vein to an email I put out on the Woodlands Park RA email group alerting our members to this issue. They live in St Ann's.
I suggested that they post their response on HOL and they declined.
As I've said earlier, I think they were ready to play this card at the meeting.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh