Tags (All lower case. Use " " for multiple word tags):
Michael's description is accurate, but I hope we backbenchers who have sat on the Housing and Regeneration Scrutiny Panel, scrutinising the HDV for a year, have demonstrated - even with this very centralised system with formal power concentrated in the Leader and the Cabinet - that they can be challenged and be effectively held to account.
As well as the scrutiny committees, we have asked question after question at the Cabinet, and made enquiry after enquiry in order to ensure there is accountability for decisions. The same legislation which brought in the Leader and Cabinet system also brought in the Scrutiny committees to provide a formal framework for accountability and checks and balances, and we have used that , as backbenchers, to hold the executive to account.
Zena
Zena Brabazon
Cllr, Harringay Ward
The increase in membership is incredibly important. You can't just gloss over that and say "what else?". In the past our Labour council candidates have been decided by a group of less than a dozen people (including the 3 candidates) and some horse trading. Then there was St Ann's in 2013 where five fraudsters and a complicit party bureaucracy allowed the selection of a party apparatchik, a local businessman and a HDV supporting trade unionist. This cannot happen with a hundred voices in the room. These councillors are then elected term after term by a group of people hundreds of time bigger than the original Labour Party selectorate that put them on the ticket. Size is important.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh