Tags for Forum Posts: parkland walk, trees
Hi Michael,
We totally understand that the bridge has to be rebuilt, that is not our objection. We object to the massive ramp the council are insisting on building next to the bridge which will take out many valuable trees and habitat. The Parkland Walk is a nature reserve and needs to be treated with care, designs including existing habitat have not been offered up. There are a number of other entrance routes when a ramp could be included. Trees can alway be retained with some design imagination and innovation, which is sadly lacking from Haringey council. The council seem to want to turn the walk into an urbanised path, rarther than retain its biodiverse nature. Thanks Gio
Thanks for the response.
That big old tree that is the main concern, is (like many of the trees on the Parkland Walk) covered in ivy and about to die. Surely with Brexit we don't need to cater for people in wheelchairs requiring ramps onto the Parkland Walk in Crouch End, they can get on at either end like the cyclists do.
Hi John. I'm a bit confused by the reference to Brexit here; what is the relevance? Thanks, Dan
Hi John,
The oak tree with the russian vine is not about to die. The ivy could be cut away carefully too. It is not only that tree which is threatened, but up to 10 trees in the viscinity,
Best Giovanna
John — Not quite sure irony works in a forum post...
The bridge has to be repaired, the ivy covered tree is no thing of beauty either, and disabled and buggy access this end of the walk is pretty woeful. It is also the only access point which has a bus that stops right next to it between Coleridge and the Highgate end of the Walk. To put in a new bridge without an access point which could be easily used by disabled people would surely be a breach of PSED. There is also a promise of replacement and additional trees win greater nos than those lost.
Hello Elizabeth,
We are not disputing the rebuilding of the bridge but the size of the ramp - a smaller ramp or slope could be designed and implemented with some imagination and will on the part of the council. The friends of the Parkland walk and ourselves (North London Tree Protectors) have identified 3 other nearby access routes quite nearby which have bus stops near to the entrances which could be developed into ramps without loss of trees (Oxford road and two others). Stanhope is a steep narrow road, served by just one hopper bus, the W5.
The tree is an oak, about 80 years old, I think it's wonderful - 11 other trees will be lost too due to the ramp forcing steps to the other side too - not just this one. The Parkland Walk is a nature reserve, not a park and in the climate crisis we need to protect our mature trees - not many of which remain on the walk.
Best wishes Gio
Oxford Road is in Stroud Green at the start of the walk. That's not an alternative for anyone living the Highgate side of the walk. There is very little past the access at Coleridge which is ok for buggies but not for wheelchairs. The new access ramp at Stapleton Hall Road is fine - looks very much like the plans for this one. It also doesn't deal with the public sector equality duty aspect of the rebuild. I get loss of trees is not great but this is an urban rewilded railway line not an ancient woodland.
Hi Elizabeth,
Oxford road is only one example, there are some other viable alternatives much nearer to Stanhope....on the Highate side. There is of course also ther access near the Bugaloo pub. I can provide you with these, my collaeague and the FOPW (friends of PW) know much more than I do....please email me on parklandwalktrees@gmail.com
The parkland walk is a green flag wildlife reserve actually, the longest liinear nature reserve in London - it has this status and should be treated as such.
Best G
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh