Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

                                                                                                                                              

There was an enthusiastic response to Monday’s Bike Breakfast on Wightman Road organised by Living Wightman and Haringey Cyclists. The event was part of national bike week, an annual opportunity to promote cycling and show how getting on your bike can easily be a part of everyday life. 

We were delighted that Joanne McCartney, London’s Deputy Mayor, Peray Ahmet, Haringey Council Cabinet Member for the Environment and Emine Ibrahim one of our local Harringay Councillors joined us to celebrate national bike week and came along to hear what a positive difference the bridge closure is making to cyclists from across Haringey.

What we Found Out

Well over 300 cyclists use Wightman between 7:30 am – 9:30 am each day to commute to work. This means 300+ less people driving to work or adding to crowds on public transport, benefiting everyone.

Haringey Cyclists pointed out  

‘A safe, low-traffic Wightman Road could provide a key part of a strategic cycle route connecting Haringey with Barnet and Enfield to the north, Hackney and Islington to the south, and beyond.’

 It was interesting to learn where people began their commute, here's where people started

Area

%

Hornsey/North Ladder

42.6%

Finsbury Park/South Ladder

23.4%

South Tottenham & Wood Green

13.7%

Enfield

8.5%

Barnet

4.3%

Muswell Hill

2.1%

Stoke Newington

2.1 %

Islington

2.1%

Waterloo

2.1 %

 

Equally interesting was where they cycled to

Area

%

City

34.0%

Islington

14.9%

East London

12.8%

West End

12.8%

Camden Town

6.4%

South London

6.4%

Ladder

4.3%

Euston

4.3%

Finsbury Park

2.1%

Wood Green

2.1%

 

Cyclists told us about their journey through Harringay. Our survey found that 96% of cyclists would prefer Wightman Road to remain a very low traffic road, as it is now, with 4% as yet undecided what the best solution going forward is. It was inspirational to hear stories from cyclist of how removing through motor traffic from this road has transformed their lives for the better.

Before the bridge works cyclists said they found Wightman Road dangerous and 72% said that the main benefit of the current arrangement is increased safety.

Tom one of the cyclists we surveyed said

‘Huge difference, every day. Despite travelling to and from central London every day, Wightman road was the obviously dangerous and threatening part of my journey in each direction. Cars would only pass dangerously close to me as I would cycle and drive concerningly close to me if they could not pass.’

Cyclists also mentioned that their cycle was far more quiet and pleasant, quicker and less polluted. They had noticed more children playing and cycling and the local community enjoying their street.

Even in the short time since the closure,16% of cyclists had shifted their journey from Green Lanes and 4% had shifted from public transport or driving to cycling their commute since the bridge works.

Our Vision

One reason for retaining a low traffic route, perhaps similar to the current configuration is that Wightman could then be promoted as a safe cycling route. It would become part of a 4mile+ safe cycle route through Alexandra Park along Wightman and through Finsbury park, linking Muswell Hill and  Alexandra Park to Central London. More people locally and further afield would be encouraged to give up their car commute. This is one example of how Living Wightman’s vision is about improving the people’s lives locally and in other areas of Haringey and in other London boroughs too.

We’ve noticed dozens of children enjoying the chance to cycle safely along Wightman to school. 

Whilst this has immediate benefits, it also lays the foundation for cycling into adulthood, by increasing confidence on the roads.

As one mother on Harringay Online has previously said

The Wightman closure has greatly improved our cycle ride to school. My kid is delighted at being able to ride on the road, there’s no way I would allow him/her to cycle on this road if it was open to traffic, even with my supervision.’

We appreciate that the traffic at peak times and during the weekends, especially on Green Lanes and Turnpike Lane is currently creating longer journey times for car and bus users. Living Wightman is also campaigning for solutions to reduce these. We believe it’s particularly important to get the buses moving. There has always been a problem with bus journey times in the area and the Harringay traffic review and our campaign presents us with an opportunity to improve these. We’re confident a lot can be done. Whilst traffic experts are the people who need to identify what will work best, the positive, wide ranging ideas generated by  Justin Guest's post about possible solutions is also just what we need.

Meanwhile let’s recognise that the bridge works have taken hundreds of cyclists out of danger and encouraged our children to cycle and celebrate that. 

Tags for Forum Posts: cycling, schools, traffic, wightman bridge closure, wightman road

Views: 3893

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

. deleted - replied to wrong post

I don't get this bike vs public transport. We should be providing as many alternatives to the car as possible. A bike is a very socially friendly form of transport (moreso than buses in my view as there is no pollution and much less danger from someone cycling). 

More pedestrians are hit by bicycles than are hit by buses so that's not entirely true....

Replying to Antoinette's assertion that more pedestrians are hit by bikes than buses

Do you have a link/reference for that? In all the official stats I have seen it's the other way round.

Here's the Road Casualties stats for 2014 - page 95 has the pedestrian casualties by vehicle type. Bikes 461, buses 1,022. (Cars 17,040)

https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_dat...

(2014 is the current version, 2015 will be published end of June)

I think I read somewhere that over 30% of inner London peak time road journeys are made by bike, it's been a growing trend and is set to overtake cars (pun intended). TfL and GLA are recognising and encouraging this - the road network needs major changes to safely support the growing numbers of cyclists. The current trend is to provide segregated cycle lanes junctions wherever possible, rather than sharing bus lanes or footpaths.

It's up to 70% in some areas, Blackfriars Bridge for instance.

There are a few areas such as Tottenham Court Road, Oxford St and Bank where they are planning private cars and taxis completely. It will be interesting if that political will extends outwards, particularly given that in a lot of boroughs car owners are actually in the minority.

Well obviously that's going to be true within the Congestion Charge zone....but we don't live in inner London....where we are it's 10%...

But a bus stops every hundred yards and holds up other traffic

Assuming it can get past the cyclists... 200m of clear open bus lane but we're stuck behind a cyclist doing 12mph
Attachments:

12mph is the top speed busses can average inside the A406. You're not stuck, just not hitting the maximum of 20mph.

Actually it's a 30mph road and yes we were stuck behind the cyclust
And for the record I'd be delighted if my 3 mile bus journey to work could achieve 12mph....currently it's more like 4mph

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service