A neat little document about 'Green Lanes'

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Hugh on June 23, 2015 at 13:45

I think both documents are Planning Dept documents. So it's Planning vs. Planning!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Gordon T on June 23, 2015 at 17:26

I got the impression from the style and content that it's derived in part from a postgraduate thesis in planning. One other point is that the 'high buildings' strategy is well covered in this report, much more so than in the Local Pan.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hugh on June 30, 2015 at 23:13

See my response above for who the collaborators were.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Hugh on July 1, 2015 at 11:46

We clearly need an emoticon denoting rhetoric!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by matthew cuthbert on August 14, 2015 at 10:33

I'm more informed on various concerns by HoL's contributions, thanks.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page