Tags (All lower case. Use " " for multiple word tags):
This happened yesterday? Why weren't local people consulted on this? Does Tottenham really need a hotel at all? There are a lot of things the area desperately needs, but a new hotel is not what is needed. This latest crackpot scheme should be opposed.
As they build up Tottnm Hale as a 'transport hub', yes it may be viable. Not known yet what will happen with preferences being expressed this week for Heathrow, Gatwick and the Thames estuary as favoured sites for bigger airports, not Stansted. Stansted doesn't have much by way of hotel choice, and it's not an overnight airport at the mo. This scheme is no more crackpot than building 3000 homes on the site, that are nearly all sold now or full of students. I don't know that area well, I wonder what this building will push out?
I do worry for the future of Tottenham Marsh. To developers and ambitious councillors, it looks like empty desert. The fate of the land that became the Olympic park was sealed by its looking like 'wasteland'.
I think plenty of people would be happy to willing to stay if the price per night is right - they can take the tube from Tottenham Hale and be in the centre of London in 15 minutes, so if the room is, say, 50 or 60 quid a night, then that's an attractive deal to many. There are similar hotels near tube lines elsewhere in zone 3.
Personally, I rather like the new tower blocks (which are really kind of cool) and - contrary to what we all thought - it seems to be a development that is doing well and is popular with people who live there.
The Hale Village development plan, as approved in 2007, includes a 100-bed hotel on the funny-shaped space facing Ferry Lane. Building has still not started - one can only infer that flats are more profitable.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh