Yesterday the long fight to save Wards Corner suffered a setback. The WCC’s application for a Judicial Review of Grainger’s latest plan was refused by the High Court of Appeal for the final time. It’s been a long process and the hearing today was the third time our case was presented to a judge. Sadly none of the judges properly engaged with the arguments brought by our legal team. We were challenging Haringey’s decision to grant permission to the Grainger development on the following 3 grounds:
Although this is the end of this attempt to bring a Judicial Review it is by no means the end of the campaign.
The Community Plan for the Wards Corner Department Store is days away from submission and details an heritage sensitive restoration of the building, one that provides space for all the businesses already on the site and creates 1000’s more feet of retail and community space. It also sets out the beginnings of a community-led model for the running and management of the site and provides a basis for our continued calls to the Council and Grainger to collaborate with local people on a solution that meets everyone’s needs.
We are also still working to stop the Grainger scheme. Next Grainger will try to forcefully purchase the remainder of the site using Compulsory Purchase legislation.
The people at Wards Corner still need your support to save the site, to defend their homes and businesses from demolition and to build a community-led future for Wards Corner. There are many ways to support the campaign:
Tags for Forum Posts: judicial review, regeneration, restoration, ward's corner
Be honest, Pam, shouldn't the detailed "Community Plan for the Wards Corner Department Store" have been prepared and in the public eye long, long before now? Rather than "days away from submission".
I'm completely unclear how this submission is intended to influence events. Are you hoping that Grainger will consider it and try to integrate elements into its own scheme? Plainly Claire Kober is in triumphalist mood. So presumably unlikely to be looking for any win-win solutions?
One irony is that there are signs that academic opinion may be shifting away from the Kober knock-it-down, social clearance, regeneration fantasies. In an online article today (29 August) in the Guardian Professional, Professor Loretta Lees describes how "Regeneration" "pushes poor families out". http://bit.ly/15zrQXi .
IMHO the two most obvious objections to the Grainger plan are irrefutable.
(1) It makes no provision for the thousands of people who currently use the market and the shops that will be destroyed - they are the silent players in this struggle. Where will they go?
and (2) the plan is based on an area plan written in the last century, ie BC - Before Crash. The High Street model it proposes is dead. Of course Grainger would still make their millions profit from the sale of the flats, as well as that nice 1.5million bung, they won't care that the line of boarded-up shell shopfronts will blight Seven Sisters, until the charity shops arrive.
Nor will the Kober Cabal. Their patch is further away.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh