Tags (All lower case. Use " " for multiple word tags):
"The upper road saw a morning increase in traffic of 73%, and 13% in the evening. On the Boulevard Saint Germain, traffic increased 41% in the morning and just 4% in the evening."
Not as simple as the headline makes out.
The headline should really have said "49.96% of its Traffic Just Disappeared".
Would you support the closure of Green Lanes rather than Wightman Road? If we're talking about pedestrianisation, isn't Green Lanes a better candidate?
Green Lanes would be an amazing town centre if it could be made, say, buses and access only. You'd have to do it in a way which didn't increase the traffic on neighbouring residential sidestreets though - what's your plan Nick?
Personally I'd support any package of measures which have the effect of reducing traffic to below say 1000 vehicles per day on the residential side-streets i.e. a level which positively encourages walking and cycling for those who are able, also reducing pollution and generally improving everyone's quality of life.
I worked for a number of years in transport network analysis, planning etc. I still try to keep up with current thinking. If you build a new road, to reduce traffic congestion, then more people use road transport, and the extra capacity fills up quickly; traffic speeds go back to where they were before the new road. If a road is closed, usually between a third and half of the traffic does just "disappear". The journeys are simply no longer made. Of course, the remaining traffic is displaced to other routes, making them more crowded. But as congestion on those routes becomes slower, so the number of vehicles and journeys flattens out. All building new roads, especially in urban areas, does is to increase the number of people using vehicles, especially private motor cars.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh