Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Owners of Proposed Triple Restaurant in former Fairline/Class A Premises Finally Come Clean

The owners of the almost complete new restaurant in the former Fairline/Class A premises have been pretending for the last year or so that their project was anything but a new restaurant. They even had their agent come on HoL to protest their innocence with regard to any such move.

Of course anyone with half a mind didn't believe them for a moment and they've now finally come clean and have applied for retrospective planning permission.

There are very sound grounds for objection to this development given in Haringey's planning policy and one hopes that the Council will make proper and fair use of these in making their planning determination. 

Local objections, particularly those that can be linked to policy are taken into account and do make a difference. Any resident can object. I am attaching a copy of the LCSP's objection which makes clear which policies can be referenced for your objection.

If you'd like to object, or support, the application, you can do so via the planning pages of Haringey's website here, using the "Comment on Application" button towards the bottom of the page. (EDIT: I made a comment essentially just supporting the LCSP's statement in its entirety).

See the tag below for all other related posts.

Tags for Forum Posts: fairline

Views: 16001

Attachments:

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There's normally an eight week target to decide an application like this. As it was validated on 21June there's still a bit of time.

One does wonder.

a launderette would be more appropriate...

Tut tut!

RETROSPECTIVE APPLICATION REFUSED!!!

Attachments:

Interesting that one of the reasons for refusing was the increase in car parking on Green Lanes

http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/Attachm...

They can trade whilst they're waiting as I understand it.

I'm a bit hazy on the appeals process but I think trading can only carry on if the appeal is against an enforcement notice but not if it's against an outright refusal to grant permission. The logic is that as planning permission should be sought BEFORE the development or activity commences, there is no need to stop whereas an enforcement notice is served on an actual infringement (the building has been built or the business has opened)
If they open for business Haringey have the option of issuing a Stop Notice and as far as I can remember ignoring a Stop Notice can be a criminal offence, so they tend only to be served in the most severe cases where the damage cannot be undone, like demolishing the listed building.

You know lots more than me, I'm sure. So I'll assume that you're right.

A very good result. Congratulations to Ian Sygrave, Zena and Hugh among others - but my heart bleeds for the Harringay Traders in general and Cllr Ali Gul Ozbek in particular.

I would recommend watching it like a hawk.
Planning Enforcement Team contact details are

Planning Enforcement
Planning & Regeneration
Place and Sustainability Directorate
6th Floor
River Park House
225 High Road
London
N22 8HQ
Tel: 020 8489 5504
https://eforms.secure.haringey.gov.uk/ufs/ufsmain?formid=PE_COMPLAI...

After spending the money the developer has on this property it would seem inevitable that they will appeal to the Planning Inspectorate against refusal. Anyone who commented should be told if this happens.

Great result.

I don't really understand why they can appeal again when permission has been refused twice (I think it's twice already)?

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service