Harringay residents gather to support the 'Living Wightman' message (Photo: Hugh Flouch)
Wightman Road is living again.
With the traffic dramatically reduced as a result of the bridge works, this is a residential community reborn.
A place where children play in the street, neighbours stop for a chat, families cycle safely through to Finsbury Park and that joggers and commuters can enjoy rather than endure.
For many of us, the idea of Wightman Road returning to a noisy, polluted traffic-clogged rat-run is unthinkable.
The peace today brings into sharp focus the nightmare that its residents have long suffered as a result of decades of planning decisions that have seen their needs come second every time to those of drivers using their home as a rat run.
Wightman Road is, unquestionably, a residential road. Despite this, it was having a massively disproportionate share of local traffic dumped on it –120,000 vehicles a week – only 40,000 less than, Green Lanes.
This level of traffic was generating dangerous levels of pollution, with children most at risk. Levels of nitrogen dioxide - a pollutant that inflames the lungs, stunts growth and increases the odds of respiratory diseases such as cancer and asthma – were much higher than EU legal limits.
Given the high proportion of deprived households on Wightman Road, some of the poorest children in Harringay were paying the price for those motorists who were using it as a rat run.
As such, Wightman Road represents in microcosm a wider divide in Harringay, which sees poorer residents suffer for the convenience of their wealthier neighbours. While 62% of households in our ward don’t have a car, ownership is high in surrounding areas such as Crouch End and Muswell Hill.
We should no longer tolerate this injustice, and we must not ignore this daily threat to the health of our community, and our children.
One of the first things that the new London Mayor, Sadiq Khan, did when he took office last month was to publish a major report on air quality. He also said nothing should be off limits when it came to tackling the issue.
He said: “Half a million under-19s in London are breathing in air in breach of NO2 levels. Separate from that, we know the air in London is responsible for 10,000 deaths last year and in parts of London children have under-developed lungs.”
But it’s not just lethal traffic pollution on Wightman Road that was a problem.
This traffic included foundation-shaking, thunderous lorries and HGVs that breach the tonnage limit with impunity. The bridge-strengthening works will give the green light for even heavier vehicles.
And more traffic will be generated by an estimated 7,500 new households created by the massive residential developments in the immediate and surrounding areas – including at Hawes & Curtis, Wightman Road Hornsey Station, Heartlands sites, Smithfield Square on Hornsey High Street and Tottenham Hale. Whilst we support the building of more affordable homes, it’s important to recognise that Harringay will accommodate a disproportionately high level of new housing in the borough. Wightman Road and the Ladder are right in the middle of all this development.
So when the bridge works finish in September, we won’t be going to back to how it was. It’s going to get worse.
So it’s in everyone’s interests that we act NOW to stand up for the quality of life of local residents, particularly children who face stark health inequalities, on Wightman Road and the surrounding area.
This is the aim behind Living Wightman; a group of residents who have come together to campaign for a safer, healthier and happier future for Wightman Road and the rest of the Ladder roads and, in doing so, inform a major initiative that Haringey Council is currently leading to address the traffic problems that have blighted Harringay for years.
In doing so, we are acutely aware of the concerns of businesses that have been affected by the current restrictions, particularly with the closure of the Alroy Road end, and congestion generated elsewhere and of the inconvenience experienced by residents in and around the Ladder.
Mindful of this, we are asking for the following:
Firstly, we’re requesting that Haringey Council extend the current arrangements beyond summer to allow time to find a long-term solution that drastically reduces traffic on Wightman Road. It isn’t practical to completely open and then limit traffic on Wightman. It would reproduce the initial chaos we all suffered when a change in access was first put in place.
Secondly, we’re proposing that any long-term solution allows access for local businesses and their customers, but stops Wightman Road being used a rat run through route as part of overall measures to improve traffic flow in the surrounding area.
Thirdly, in the meantime, we want to encourage even more people to take advantage of a safer, healthier, quieter Wightman Road, especially cyclists to use it as an alternative to Green Lanes as a route to Central London . We also want residents to share their experiences and ideas about how we can build on these gains and go forward.
There will be those who say it can’t be done.
You only have to look at access restrictions in the Gardens roads, on Hermitage Road and Harringay Road to see that this is not the case.
There will be those who say that the surrounding areas can’t cope with the displaced traffic.
The current situation, with congestion at times, at certain pinch points , is certainly far from ideal, but we know that there has been a drop in car journeys as a result of Wightman Road no longer being used as a rat run.
Anecdotally, many residents also report walking, cycling and using public transport more and, if they have cars, using them more thoughtfully – for example, running errands as part of one journey rather than making lots of short trips.
This decline in car use can only help ease congestion in the long-term and be welcome if the Council is serious about meeting its ambitious aim of reducing carbon emissions by 40% in just four years.
But there is no question that we are anti-car. Many of us are motorists. Rather that the Living Wightman campaign is pro-people and communities.
The current arrangements on Wightman Road – for example, pavements in terrible condition impassable to wheelchairs and buggies in some places because of cars parked on the pavement rather than the road, are about as anti-people as you can get.
They are unsafe, potentially in breach of equalities laws and prioritise the rights of people using the road as a rat run over those who live there.
This cannot be right and is totally unfair.
We only want for our children and quality of life what our neighbours in places where this has been made a priority are getting without question.
No residential road should have 120,000 cars, vans and lorries roaring past people’s homes every week
No child should have their health put at risk and their lives cut short by dangerous levels of pollution
As we are seeing now, in a safer, healthier, happier Wightman Road, there is a better way for Harringay .
So let’s be ambitious and imaginative in striving for this together.
What can you do?
To find out more, get involved, tell us what you think, share your ideas, please get in touch. You can:
Tags for Forum Posts: traffic, wightman bridge, wightman bridge closure
Stephen - But wouldn't all the other traffic slow up the trams by literally sitting in their traffic jams over the tram tracks, esp in a gridlocked city like London?
I see Melbourne (pop 4.5m) is currently the city with the most extensive tram network. Next biggest tram networks are in decending order, St Petersburg, Amsterdam, Upper Silesia, Berlin, Moscow & Vienna. I guess if Moscow (pop 12m) can run a tram network successfully London should be able to, however Moscow probably never ripped up their tram tracks like London did. Reinstalling tram tracks is messy (see the Edinburgh case).
Btw I like trams a lot. We used them daily in Den Haag last week. The tracks however take up a lot of land where they're not incorporated into the roads themselves.
Generally, the reason most business complain about parking restrictions, is that they themselves can't park their own private vehicles in front of their place of work.
This notion about large loss of business is really a myth.. that is unless, you happen to run a drive-in take away or large supermarket business.
EXACTLY! I have snapped business owners who park outside their businesses on Green Lanes because they can run out yelling "loading loading" if someone tries to give them a ticket for years.
I actually think that tram tracks down the middle of the road (where necessary), would be more self regulatory than permanent bus lanes.
Car drivers are more wary of trams than they are of buses. .
10,000 premature deaths a year from airborne pollutants. #tradeoffs
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh