Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!
Haringey Green Party Manifesto 2026
Tags for Forum Posts: haringey green party
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Martin (Woodside)
-
Open borders and legalisation of all drugs, what could possibly go wrong?.
No thanks.
-
Permalink Reply by Dominic Hinshelwood
-
You obviously did not read it
-
Permalink Reply by Alan Stanton
-
That's not what this Haringey Manifesto says, Martin. It's not what Zack Polanski says either.
And in any case he's not standing in Haringey.Why not argue on the basis of actual facts rather than exaggeration?
How about telling us about you? Are you hoping to stand? Which party are you supporting? Surely you are proud ro mention them?
-
Permalink Reply by Clive Carter
-
ALAN, I was pleased to see effective commentary from local Greens about the council's half-decade deal with the dominant live-music multi-national.
Lock-in: Haringey Council rushes through five-year Live Nation Deal days bef...
Companies don't always expand to be a global monopolist by playing nice.
There is no visible evidence of bribery in the local leadership's gigantic favour to the giant corporation. At the same time, the unseemly and extraordinary pre-election haste exhibited, is not inconsistent with corruption.
Under what must have been high pressure to lock-in before the election, Haringey Council disregard their own rules. Their "Stakeholder" consultation was seriously flawed; they've claimed it was a "non-key" decision—which is a gross distortion in their effort to avoid Scrutiny—and they have acted in less than good faith throughout.
Far from delivering change, the Party of the majority Group offers more of the same …
-
-
Clive, there was, as you and I know and said, an opportunity for the LibDems and Green councillors to "Call-In" this deal before the pre-election started.
Maybe, behind the scenes steps were taken?I was a Labour councillor and a member for years, So the Greens have good reason to distrust me.
But did anyone talk to you?
Plainly the attempt to avoid Call-In by labelling it a non-key decision made no sense whatever. Did it affect at least two wards? Yes. And more.
Was the minimum amount of money exceeded? Yes again.
Where can anyone check the rules? In the Council's Constitution; easily searchable online.
-
Permalink Reply by Michael Anderson
-
-
ALAN, I agree that the attempt to avoid Call-In by labelling it a non-key decision made no sense.
The council is trying to rely on what IMO is a flawed view expressed in a nearly 10 year old High Court Decision, relating to the applicability of the council's Key Decision criteria, to the facts of the commercial exploitation of a public park.
There are two elements of the council's definition: (a) accounting/economic and (b) community impact.
Those two elements are separated by OR and not by AND.
If one understands that a dollar save is a dollar earned, then the judge's view on the money transaction makes little sense.
However, the judge appeared to take no notice at all about the council's own, alternative definition (on community impact), apparently on the grounds that the barrister made no submissions about the second part. Despite the fact that the second part was and remains a council rule.
-
Permalink Reply by Jamie Harper
-
Perhaps you've been watching too much of Laura Kuennsberg, Alan. It's entirely disingenuous to lay blame at opposition parties' doors, without pressing governing party members in the same way.
What did the local councillors and cabinet members do to stop this? A simple question, and one you could have asked at any point across the dining table in the past week.
-
-
Could you point out where these policies are in the manifesto - I must have missed them when I read it. Ta.
-
-
I’ve pulled out this bit of the Manifesto ‘We will deliver the Haringey Walking and
Cycling Action Plan in full, re-allocating
road space to make streets safer, reduce
pollution and enable healthier living. Build
a safe, joined-up cycle network, including
a north-south route through the borough.’
Does anyone who has been more involved in the active travel programme know what this means - is it a commitment to sort Green Lanes or is that my wishful thinking?
-
Permalink Reply by Anna Abela
-
Hi Anita,
The Haringey Walking and Cycling Action Plan is a 10-year plan - running from 2022-2032 - that the Haringey Labour administration adopted in 2022 to enable more walking and cycling in the Borough.
We have already implemented many of its measures in the first four years of the plan (notably 37 new School Streets, two of which are in Harringay, and 300 new bike hangars) - but there are still six more years of implementation left. We have made a commitment in our 2026 Haringey Labour manifesto to prioritise investing in new segregated cycle lanes on main roads in the next four years.
Cllr Brabazon and I have also been working with council officers on a Green Lanes Safety Improvement Plan, which is currently undergoing feasibility testing before the designs are published for consultation.
Feel free to drop me an email or come to my next surgery - on 28th March at 11am at the TCCA - if you'd like to chat about this in more detail.
Best,
Anna
Cllr Anna Abela
Labour councillor for Harringay ward
© 2026 Created by Hugh.
Powered by
