Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

A sign of the times.

It has been announced that Government funding for free swimming has been withdrawn from July 31. As a result, the Council has decided that that free swimming for Haringey residents who are 60 and over and 16 and under is to end in the autumn.

From September, Haringey residents who are 65 and over will continue to be able to swim for free from Monday-Friday from 9am-5pm if they have registered through the Active Card Scheme.

Children under three will also swim free of charge.

Finally under the Haringey school swimming programme children aged 9,10 and 11 who swim 50m front crawl and 50m back crawl will receive a book of swimming tickets for up to 50 free swims.

No new registrations for free swimming will be processed after August 6.



Tags for Forum Posts: public spending cuts, sport and leisure, swimming

Views: 876

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Fascinating, John, that you draw a parallel with road safety. The figures for deaths and serious injuries in road accidents remain horrifying. With children at very high risk.

Of course parents have (and should have) the major responsibility for supervising their children. And this means not just talking to children about road safety but setting a good example themselves when they're out. (Learning-at-parents'-side has got to be the most effective way.) Then with teenagers - talking about whose car they don't get into.

But what if this doesn't happen?

Are you saying, John, that schools have no part to play? Or that in the interest of "handing power back to the people" councils should stop school crossing patrols?

I don't think even Mary Whitehouse wanted to ban the Tufty Club which ran on TV for decades.

There are also some worrying questions about families from other societies who settle here, but have little or no experience of big city traffic. Just over six years ago I raised this issue with Haringey. I'd done some phoning around and was concerned that a number of key agencies (then) had no figures about accidents and ethnicity.

Going back to swimming, as a councillor, my Tottenham Hale ward includes a stretch of the River Lee. Deaths from drowning are thankfully few. But when they happen everyone is shocked and upset - and especially when it's a child.

I simply don't accept that we ought solely to expect parents to teach swimming and water safety.
I didn't draw that parallel - James W did.

And I don't think the Tufty Club could be regarded as salacious or offensive.

As I said to Liz, it was a genuine question, not a snipe.

And as I also said, it's now up to the Councillors to decide whether to put money into free swimming. I think they should. No doubt you will promote this in the Council yourself.
My personal thoughts are that if the only reason someone will use a facility is because its free then its a total waste of time. If they don't want to swim they won't.

To paraphrase:
My personal thoughts are that if the only reason someone will use a facility is because it's free then it's a total waste of time. If they don't want to read books, they won't.
Do the Council pay for lessons on how to cross the road safely ?
No, but TFL do!
Think you'll find there's lots of public money spent on road safety campaigns John.

By the way, Will has a point. As far as I know, lessons in schools for children have not been cut and the mention of the Haringey school swimming programme implies that lessons for school children are the norm and that learning will be rewarded with free swimming. What is cut here is kids not having to pay at swimming pools not lessons or school swimming programmes. Let's not get carried away.

Also, this is not Haringey's fault. The money for this scheme was one of the first things pulled by the coalition back in June. The fact that it has been carried through to the autumn means that they are funding it for as long as they are able but I think they fact they have a massive shortfall in funding for primary places and that the DOE is refusing to even talk to Haringey about it is probably a bigger headache for the council for now...and should it be for us too?

No sympathy for the over 60s losing their free swimming by the way?
Free swimming for under threes will continue for the time being be sure to take advantage of it.

Sadly as you must know , many households in Tottenham live on less than £10 a day and Tottenham constituency is near the top for child poverty. Arranging your finances may be just a bit trickier if you have very little to arrange in the first place. Free activities level that football field just a little, perhaps? I also read an interesting article the other day that suggests that in a true Big Society, all those people paying and giving heaps of time to ferrying kids to private lessons should consider ploughing some of that surplus time and cash into volunteering/donating to run kids sports and activities clubs, then everyone in the community benefits. Worth consideration at least.

btw Weren't you arguing before that this was not about lessons being axed now you seem to be saying that swimming shouldn't be taught at all by the state, not even in schools? Sorry if I misunderstand but I'm not sure why swimming lessons at school should be the state bringing my children up. What's the difference between learning to swim at school and learning French? Both useful skills and hardly abdicating responsibility to let qualified teachers do it.
Re CRB, You may not need to rant about it. I For people with low contact with children, I believe the coalition have halted the measures proposed by the former government and I'm sure that the Big Society policy makers must recognise this as an issue. I actually believe that there a quite a few myths around CRB checks and volunteering but having undergone a few in my time, they are hardly a problem, although I recognise that they may not be failsafe and some people feel uncomfortable with them
Thanks Liz. It was a genuine question about crossing the road, neither rhetorical nor a sneer.

And no - I didn't have free swimming lessons when I was a kid. National Dried Milk and orange juice, yes :-)

Just to add to the confusion - this poster is currently on display at Turnpike Lane tube stn.


Note for the hard of understanding - it's about swimming LESSONS :-)
Well we were fortunate enough to have Free Swimming Lessons in Tottenham/later Haringey schools ..Was that a snear I heard?

They were part of our Free Education and considered to be worthwhile by the then government. Tory BTW. oh - but they were 'decent 'chappies in those days..

Be ashamed of yourself for even considering it..

Oh and Will, it's always the same with bad ideas - they always tend to get misunderstood..
Be ashamed of yourself for even considering it..

Considering WHAT for God's sake ?
That's a different scheme, the Take the Plunge scheme for non swimmers to get them started. The lessons take place over six weeks and are on offer at Park Road, Northumberland Park and Tottenham Green swimming pools.After completing the six-week course, people are encouraged to continue to learn to swim - with additional lessons starting at £1 a class, depending on the time of the class.
I suppose an equally valid question might be why free casual swimming for children was introduced in the last year at all. Free leisure swimming for kids is a "nice to have", not an essential and certainly not a human right.

It's clear that the government last year was aware of the massive debt that needed to be cut. I'm not sure I'm being overly cynical when this seems to me like a politically charged initiative, designed to make the last govt appear generous, and the new lot stingy and mean by introducing 11th hour pre-election handouts that were always going to be totally unsustainable given the country's finances.
Well, a pre-election handout is one interpretation, but the LGA reporting of it implied that it was part of the government’s aim to get people more active in the run up to the 2012 Olympics as part of the Olympic legacy. This press release dated 2008 welcomes the fact that over 60s were also included and suggests it doesn't go far enough. So this was proposed quite a long time before the election, 2 yrs in fact - was the Labour government so far gone in the final term that all its long term planning was simply to make any subsequent government look stingy?

This article from the Guardian makes for an interesting read on the issue.

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service