ONE WEEK on from the Wireless festival, I took these photos yesterday, Saturday.
Is there less damage to our grounds than from the last big concert?
(click photos for a larger image)
Some of the damage to paths may have been caused before the most recent concert; some parts however, look worn and beaten: recently. Due to the Council Cabinet's Concerts policy, next year our park will be used more intensively.
The Routemaster 60th anniversary show is visible in some shots – last day is today, well worth a visit – one can inspect the ground at the same time.
Councillor | Highgate Ward
Liberal Democrat Party
__________________________________________________________________________________
Here, I had seen this part of the path before it was filled with wood-chips (visible above).
The gouging was relatively deep.
Tags for Forum Posts: finsbury park, finsbury park events, finsbury park stakeholder group, wireless festival
Whether or not there is less damage than last time, it looks like there is plenty of damage. And compacted and destroyed grass doesn't recover instantly. I think its unacceptable that our parks are being used for commercial purposes which mean huge parts (and usually the most popular areas for picnics and informal sports) cannot be used by residents for large parts of the summer. The events may only last a couple of days, but huge areas are fenced off not just during the event but also for set up and take down, and will probably have to be fenced off again to allow the grass to be restored.
On top of that you have the noise, which could be heard a very long distance away (I even heard it while trying to escape the event by going to Lordship Rec), and the damage and pollution caused by all the trucks setting up and taking down.
Parks should be restored to being places for residents to relax, get exercise and enjoy the benefits and beauty of nature. If people want commercial events they can go to commercial locations - there are plenty of these already.
finsbury park has been used for big festivals for the last 20years i have lived in the area and prob many years before-to be honest I have always thought its been great but better when there used to be more free festivals whereas most you have to pay for now
of course it is always going to cause some damage but grass is easily repaired, but my question is it bringing money into the neighbourhood or is it costing us money to clean up-
if its not costing haringay anything well then its all good, park has been using the area for festivals for years, and people should have checked out the area before moving here
compacted and destroyed grass doesn't recover instantly
MOST of the grass that was covered over (for a week or two) has faded, and it may recover in another week or two. However large areas – those trampled underfoot – may take longer to re-grow.
In the sites of gouged ground, wood chips have been placed, but to what purpose is obscure. It seems to be cosmetic/camoflage.
Since my first post, a local resident drew my attention to the impact on the east side of our public park, that I had not seen. Yesterday, I took these shots, almost all of which are on the east side parallel with Seven Sisters Road (click for larger image):
In the foreground, barely a blade of grass left
Currently, nearly a desert ...
Our amenity is a Grade II listed park, according to the Council (see foot)
In 2005, our park received a £5,000,000 award from the Heritage Lottery Fund
This is not going to heal itself. Woodchips will be scattered by dogs, blown away or become sodden with rain.
According to the council Finsbury Park provides a rich tapestry of landscapes.
It was a Green Flag Award Winner 2007—2013, "and has retained it ever since"
I also noticed a few lumps of metal, scaffold and nuts and so on that had clearly been dropped and not picked up when they were packing away.
I noticed those too Andrew.
The Council also claims on its website that,
It is the largest park managed by the Council and offers a peaceful green retreat from its urban built-up surroundings
Would that that were true year round. The two weeks or so – during the height of summer – in which the main part of the park is denied as a public amenity, does not reflect the whole period during which the park ceases to be available as a "peaceful green retreat", AKA a proper public park.
Some (most?) local people may just want to use the park as a park but can't because of these activities. Surely authorities should allow Arsenal and THFC to host more of these big concerts and intensive, heavy duty activities and save the parks for their primary usage as havens of greenery and quiet, with areas reserved for sports.
If a small but civic minded bunch of residents living in the shadow of Dublin's Croke Park can force a Texan 'country singer' in a stetson to cancel his 5 consecutive nightly concerts and refund the cost of 400,000 tickets,
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-28314675
why can't we find a bunch of similarly civic-spirited residents of Harringay Ladder capable of preventing Kober&Ko from allowing Arctic Monkeys, Wireless etc to lock down and deafen our area for days and nights on end, leaving our Park unusable in the process?
Thanks for the link Eddie. I note that the Chief Executive of Dublin City Council said,
the promoters were told that there were serious concerns about how the concerts would affect local residents
The serious concerns of local residents here [about next year's intensified concerts programme in Finsbury Park], were in January put to our council's Scrutiny Committee. The concerns were heard, but not heeded.
Two of the then local councillors suggested a range of alternatives and compromises, but they were disregarded. These included smaller concerts. The opportunity of sending the Cabinet's policy back to them for review, was missed. There was a determination to proceed with the mega-concerts – that will also have the greatest impact on our public park.
Instead, a Finsbury Park Strategy Group was proposed.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh