"MP David Lammy has slammed the Government for not doing enough to stop betting shops opening in the borough.
The Government refused to adopt the betting shop recommendations set out by retail guru Mary Portas in her action plan to transform Britain’s high streets.
The Labour MP said: “I am seriously disappointed with the Government’s response to the Portas Review.
.
link to whole story in Haringey Independent
.
The reported comments of Cllr Nigun Canver show a continuation of a misguided approach. While I agree with Cllr Canver's goal (of reducing the proliferation of betting shops), I believe the stated means of achieving this are doomed to fail.
There is mention of seeking improvement via change in Planning laws and giving more powers to councils and communities to control new betting shops. This approach will continue to fail - in the courts, where it matters – because the power and thrust of the last government's Gambling Act is misunderstood.
Unless and until the Gambling Act – with its instruction to "AIM TO PERMIT" (new gambling premise applications) is amended, any tinkering with other legislation will have no effect other than to increase work for barristers.
There is already significant evidence as to how Courts interpret this Act and its surprising that comments about ameliorating the situation don't take this into account.
Tags for Forum Posts: Lammy, Portas, betting, bookies, gambling, shops
For this I have summed up into four words: "David Lammy- a hypocrite."
The Haringey Independent has two related stories today:
Wot Neville said
I've heard several times the suggestion that Mr Lammy is a hypocrite over gambling law. I'm not sure its fair, because hypocrisy involves saying and doing contradictory things, at the same time.
It is sad to note that in the last government (ended May 2010), Mr Lammy is likely to have played a leading role in producing the Gambling Act (2005), which IMO is the source of gambling proliferation in recent times, esp. clustering of betting shops in poorer areas. At least some of this wasn't foreseen and may have been unintended consequences.
However more recently, Mr Lammy has been prominent in opposing the effects of the Gambling Act and I for one welcome his change of heart. I suspect and I would like to think, that privately he has some regrets over his Act.
A politician who changes their mind, in good faith, shouldn't be criticised for finally finding the right path.
Today, this is not about Mr Lammy's past, but about the undesirable effects of the past government's Gambling Act. So far sadly the current government seems disinclined to take the necessary action to repeal at least parts of this flawed or evil Act.
I'd like LAbour to pledge to do something about this then.
Too much talk and no action. I am a leftie but they were in power for years and adopted a completely laisser faire attitude to town centre planning.
(Haringey Independent)
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh