Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Found article from the web:

 

 

Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has ordered every council to publish a list of the land and buildings they own.

He said most taxpayers were not aware of the "sheer scale and scope" of the number of assets owned by the public sector.

The Government wants all public bodies to catalogue every asset in a bid to identify billions of pounds of potential savings.

Land and property owned by the public sector are worth an estimated £385 billion, with almost two-thirds owned by councils, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG). Ministers believe that around £35 billion could be saved over 10 years through "better property management".

Mr Pickles said: "We need to know, now more than ever, exactly what assets are publicly owned. The general public probably have no idea of the sheer scale and scope of property and land on the public sector's books. In many cases it goes way beyond traditional frontline services.

"I want the public sector to take a good hard look at what they own. By cataloguing each and every asset councils can help Government find innovative new ways to utilise them, improve local services, keep council running costs down and save taxpayers' money.

"This asset information also holds huge potential for local communities, offering an at a glance way to find that new meeting place or rescue the derelict tennis court round the corner."

A new "demonstration map" published on the DCLG website has located more than 180,000 assets owned by almost 600 public sector bodies, including central Government and 87 councils.

Shadow local government minister Jack Dromey said: "Councils have a duty to tackle waste and ensure the assets they hold deliver the best value for money for local people.

"However, nothing should deflect from the fact that the size and speed of the Tory-led government's decision to hit councils with deliberately frontloaded cuts has seen frontline services lost, cuts to charities and the voluntary sector and local jobs lost."

 

To see public assets near your area:

 

http://publicassets.communities.gov.uk/

Tags for Forum Posts: assets, bodies, communities, councils, cuts, local, map, owned, public, publicly, More…sector, services

Views: 191

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Perhaps we should be a just little more sceptical.

And spot that several assertions are being made which are then merged into broad unproven claims. Including the idea that selling off publicly-owned assets is automatically a good thing, leading to "savings"; and "better value".

In some cases that may be true. In others it's just as likely to be another version of the fiasco when the Government eyed-up publicly owned woodland.

(Labour councillor Tottenham Hale ward)

And another fiasco - Firoka and Alexandra Palace.

Ally Pally should not appear on any Haringey Council list of assets, for the good reason that the council does not own it. As a Charitable Trust, we, the citizens of north London (NB, not Haringey Borough) own it.

This, despite the way the council treats it – as a municipal department, managed by a council committee (the sub-set of the Trustee known as the Trust "Board").

As regards ownership, the council asserts that our Charity owes money to the Trustee (the council). This is the more than £40,000,000 worth of undischarged (bogus) debt (every last penny of it, is council ordained spending). No, it doesn't make sense but this is Haringey.

While on this subject (which number, Alan?) I wonder whether or not the requirement of local authorities to disclose items of expenditure of more than £500 applies to our Trust. Another conflict of interest?

Yes, indeed, John. Though a lot more than a mere fiasco. As we learned from the three Walklate Reports about Firoka and its dealings with my former colleague Cllr Charles Adje.

And grateful thanks to everyone who helped ensure that the Walklate reports were commissioned and published in full. Including Ally Pally Board members, Haringey officers, and the Standards Committee. And of course thanks to Clive Carter.

But what on earth has it to do with the issues around disclosing local authority-owned assets?

This is one of the most disingenuous lines from The Gherkin in what is becoming the biggest cheerleader for austerity in Cameron's budget. The lie that the Council can sell off assets to pay to continue services is outrageous in that the DCLG know only too well that local government finance regulations prevent us from doing just that. Don't ask me why but the Council has to keep distinct its capital budget from it's revenue account, the latter of which pays for the running of services. So not quite sure how the capital could spare people from the harsh impacts of government cuts to our revenue account.

The lie that the Council can sell off assets to pay to continue services

Joe are you aware that the council tried to sell off our Charity's main asset, Alexandra Palace, for a rumoured £1.5m (and fantastical profit-share)?

This shady deal was pushed as hard as possible by disgraced Councillor Charles Adje, who also pushed the notorious Licence to Firoka, that led to losses of more than £2m. I understand the unrepentant Cllr. Adje returns to the council this week.

Will any serious, meaningful attempt be made to recover these money?

Instead of asset sales, should we not look hard at any source for money to help prevent closure of old people's homes and youth clubs?

Surely the Borough could do with the Firoka-Licence-loss cash back?

.

If you want to see the councils full accounts you can do so at their auditors until 16th August, this is a legal right available each year: http://www.haringey.gov.uk//index/council/performance_and_finance/f...

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service