I HAVE never subscribed to the Daily Mail and can't remember if I've ever actually purchased a copy. I sometimes read it in the local library. It's a popular, mainstream paper but I've never been entirely comfortable with it as I am comfortable with broadsheets. Like other tabloids, the DM is often sensational and it seems FURY often appears as part of a headline on the front page! I could probably write a critique of its style. There's lots of human-interest stories and the target market is women.
Having said that, I'm astonished the hold that this single newspaper has over the minds of some HoL contributors. I did a search for 'Daily Mail' on HoL and found 72 pages worth of results (try it yourself!). The DM's editors would probably be flattered. To the extent that the DM is seen as a journal of record, some of these will be links to news articles of course. But many use it as a short-hand term of abuse, like "lefty" or "nazi", as we've seen recently.
Most newspapers have a political line or editorial slant and the Mail is no exception.
But has the Daily Mail reader epithet now become on HoL a lazy substitute for reasoned argument and independent thought?
.
Tags for Forum Posts: argument, daily, epithet, mail, tabloid
-
▶ Reply to This