Tags (All lower case. Use " " for multiple word tags):
John, the bike-stand issue is of course a serious one. But the volume of discussion might be explained as an example of what you'll know as "bike-shedding". A reference to Parkinson's Law of Triviality. (Sometimes referred to as PLOT)
I smiled wryly when I first read Parkinson's chapter. Because I'd previously noticed a phenomenon which I labelled "The tea-towel problem". I was researching cooperative and collective teamwork and noticed that meetings often got heated when discussing something like a rota for washing utensils in the staff room; or who hadn't taken their turn laundering the tea towels. This often seemed a 'safe' proxy for other more sensitive topics.
But C.Northcote Parkinson had - as usual - got there first with PLOT. So "The Tea Towel Problem" never made it into management writing. Incidentally, people often underestimate his books as humorous spoofs of how groups and organisations work. Actually, what he wrote was deadly serious as well.
Sorry to hear about your froth.
yep, so many responses yet it doesn't change anything. We all react because we hope that at least on such small matters, we might have an impact. The naivety...
John, I think the level of interest reflects several things:
Surprise that the earlier discussion (July/August – that went into detail about the drawbacks of the (as I think of them) elegant pedestrian-catchers – was not much taken note of; that so few appear to have been consulted and that the replacement stands are only a marginal improvement.
If you're a car-driving artist, you might wonder what all the fuss is about; if you're a practical cyclist, you might have hoped that the authorities would show more care and attention to cycling provision.
Osbawn, your local councillor rightly said on 4 August,
‘I think the corners of the cycle racks are dangerous as they are so sharp, if a cyclist or a pedestrian was struck and hit the corner of the stand the injuries would I think be more serious.’
At the end of July I had submitted a formal Council question asking for the amount the [catchers] cost. The answer revealed that installing and buying 72 new cycle stands cost £17,000. The response from the Labour Cabinet Member for the Environment went on to say that:
“It became evident to officers following the receipt of the racks in May this year, that they were not fit for purpose with manufacturing and design flaws.”
By early August, your local Councillor had correctly summarised a list of practical and safety issues. This seemed to acknowledged the real problems. The replacement racks are starting to come and it's now suggested that they look better. But, are they a significant improvement and were all the lessons learnt?
Perhaps no further claims beyond looks are being made, because no further claims can be made.
Clive Carter
Highgate Councillor
Cyclist & cycling advocate
omg- so much controversy over bike stands- didnt know there were so many cycling enthusiasts in haringey- do come to the haringey lcc social in the new year
personally i like them, they are big enough to be solid, no more hard edges to scratch my bike and not nearly as ugly and solid as many bike stands are- never seen anyone able to break through a bike stand- its always stronger than any lock
But my only criticism is that its a shame they couldnt be more spread out with say i or 2 at bottom of every road rather than clusters every few roads- now so many railings have been taken down, unfortunately have to use bike stands to get my d lock through but dont see the point of walking 2-3 streets to find one- misses the point of cycling in the first place
otherwise good job, thanks Adam and all those otherwise involved
Apologies if I've missed something earlier, but this all seems so bizarre. There are literally dozens of manufacturers who will sell you, off-the-shelf, a stainless steel Sheffield stand with a tap plate.
e.g. http://www.marshalls.co.uk/commercial/street-furniture/products/oll...
There are a couple of these in Wood Green High Road, opposite Sainsbury's. (With yellow hi-vis bands on the sides, too, though these could do with replacing.)
Doesn't this solve the aesthetic 'problem' and the quality problem?
I've just walked past the replacement stands, and they're so obviously set at the wrong angle, as were the originals, that they're bound to be replaced before long. Can we just get this right to begin with?
Aidan thanks for the link. Can't see much wrong with those simple, straightforward designs. Although it doesn't seem necessary in Marshalls' photo, I note the stands are mounted in diagonal plan. When stands are erected along pavements, this ought to be norm. Sometimes this simple, basic factor is got right. Note the placing of the row of stands near Lidl's Finsbury Park (Seven Sisters Road, opposite Blackstock Road).
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh