Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Seems we have our own media star - for all the wrong reasons - renting out property in Haringey. Link to the Guardian story below
http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jul/23/north-london-landlord-...
The total fines of £16,565 for seven separate separate convictions do make you wonder just how seriously the the judicial system takes the health and safety of tenants who rent privately. Considering the difficult of even getting cases like this to court I think the staff who deal with private sector housing deserve a bit of a pat on the back.

Tags for Forum Posts: Housing

Views: 599

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

As they say the fines are just a drop in the ocean to these people who don't mind taking the money but not the responsibilities.

I genuinely feel that councils should be allowed to take compulsory ownership of houses belonging to slum landlords who continuously flout the health and safety of their tenants. Unfortunately with the benefits cap this will only get worse.
Under certain circumstances local authorities can use compulsory purchase but if they do -

They have to compensate the owner for the value of the property - so big bucks in London
They have to bear the cost of bringing the property up to habitable or safe standards
They take on the management of the property if it is tenanted
They take on responsibility for finding occupants a new home if the property simply can't be lived in

In these circumstances a lot of local authorities only use the power as a rare, last option. They mainly try to work with the owner to bring it up to standard and if that doesn't work, take them to court. They can also carry out works in default themselves and the try to pursue the pay back of the costs. A property that has got to this stage usually has an owner who doesn't want to play ball so recovering costs proves very difficult.

There was a saga with a beautiful early Victorian house in Hampstead which was actually falling down. The council wanted to CPO it but the ownership was such a tangled web of companies and off shore businesses all they could do for a couple of decades was shore it up and put up a fence to stop in falling on passers by.
Good point. It would be better just to chuck the owners in prison. Preferably one that was poorly maintained and overcrowded.
Yes, perhaps the experience of a "studio apartment (cell) with ensuite (slop bucket) and shared facilities (6 showers between 200 blokes)" would awaken some sense of understanding for the conditions some of their tenants live in. Could even charge them market rents. So if it was Wandsworth nick, £1,500 a month?

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service