Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Harringay’s Green Lanes - the most complained about for smells / smoke in Haringey this year

Over half (56%) of all complaints received about smoke / smells in Haringey so far this year are for our little stretch of Green Lanes. Source - Haringey Council FOI request (data 1 Jan to 8 Sept 26).

Over half for the whole of Haringey. It is hard to see that as anything but a problem.

However, the council officers continue to go through the bureaucracy of nice little chats with the businesses and developing a policy to allow them to enforce the Clean Air Act 1993 (yes it has been over 20 years but Haringey Council is only getting around to taking a look at it).

We should be furious. Our children's health is being put at risk. Our homes are filled with pollution.

And action?

I wonder if our elected officials understand the scale of the outrage here and actually plan on enforcing the law as written nearly a quarter of a century ago?

Also, who is coming to eat in restaurants on a smoke filled street? Who is bringing their family? Is this really the cuisine culture we want to promote?

Views: 444

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hi Alice,

However, the council officers continue to go through the bureaucracy of nice little chats with the businesses and developing a policy …

———

There's probably not a single official handbook titled'Official Council Excuses'

However, community activists, local government researchers and urban planners have widely documented a recurring repertoire of bureaucratic deflection tactics.

These standard refrains are frequently deployed by bureaucrats and councils to explain away delays, deflect responsibility, or kick contentious issues into the long grass.

Further research has yielded a list of standard excuses for bureaucratic sclerosis that exists to some extent in all local authorities. Could not all the 12 points below apply to Haringey Council some of the time and some of them apply all the time?

———

The 12 standard municipal excuses for inaction

  1. "It's not currently in the budget."

    • Translation: We allocated funds elsewhere or refuse to prioritise this, but blaming an abstract financial deficit sounds more professional than saying "we don't want to spend money on it."

  2. "We are waiting on a report/study."

    • Translation: Commissioning a feasibility study, traffic survey, or environmental impact assessment is the gold standard for buying 12 to 18 months of breathing room without actually deciding anything.

  3. "That falls under the jurisdiction of another department/agency."

    • Translation: Passing the hot potato. It might technically be true (e.g., splitting hairs between county highways and local district services), but residents are left trapped in an inter-departmental game of ping-pong.

  4. "It requires a complete review of our overarching policy framework."

    • Translation: Instead of fixing an isolated problem, we are going to frame it as a massive systemic issue that requires rewriting guidelines, which could take years.

  5. "We are currently constrained by statutory guidelines."

    • Translation: Blaming higher levels of government or rigid legal frameworks. Often used even when local discretion actually exists.

  6. "We need to consult with stakeholders and conduct community engagement."

    • Translation: Weaponizing democracy. Public consultations are vital, but they are frequently spun up as a stalling tactic when the council wants to dilute momentum or exhaust persistent campaigners.

  7. "It's a matter of prioritising limited municipal resources."

    • Translation: A polite way of saying, "Your specific neighborhood or issue doesn't rank high enough on our political radar to care right now."

  8. "There is an ongoing legal review/risk assessment on this matter."

    • Translation: Instant, impenetrable stonewalling. The moment legal risk is invoked, staff are legally or administratively barred from discussing the issue further, freezing all action.

  9. "That will be addressed as part of the upcoming master plan."

    • Translation: The long-term deflection. Why fix a broken pavement or hazardous junction today when a 10-year master plan vaguely mentions redeveloping the whole zone eventually?

  10. "We haven’t received enough public complaints to justify a change."

    • Translation: Demanding proof of a widespread outcry. If only a few people speak up, it’s dismissed as an "isolated incident"; if a crowd shows up, it's dismissed as "a vocal minority."

  11. "Staffing shortages and high turnover have impacted our capacity."

    • Translation: An increasingly common, hard-to-dispute operational reality in local government that instantly explains why emails go unanswered and dossiers sit unread on desks.

  12. "We must wait for the outcome of the upcoming election / change in administration."

    • Translation: Kicking the can down the road because current elected officials don't want to tie the hands of the next council—or take the political heat right before a vote.

.

Could any of the above factors be relevant to Haringey Council's compliant conduct in regard to the "compliant" charcoal burning emissions from restaurants along Green Lanes?

Does the council remember in whose interests they're supposed to be working for?

Haringey Council's Statutory Director of Public Health is Dr Will Maimaris, who reports to the Corporate Director of Adults, Housing and Health Sarah Sutton who in turn, reports to the CEO Andy Donald; AKA Head of Paid Service.

Leadership and direction are needed.

#PublicHealth

.

They (the Council and restaurants) don't care about us. 

Keep pushing it all aside. 

I don't use any restaurants round here, can't see the attraction of giving business to those polluting our streets and homes. 

RSS

Advertising

© 2026   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service