'Shaftesbury House 22 April 2026 ~ photo credit: Martin Ball
Haringey Council bought Shaftesbury House against the advice of the supposed users, the Peacock light industrial estate.
The purchase was one of nine irregular council deals considered by the external investigator Chris Buss in a version of the Report commissioned by the council itself (the "full" Report sent to the Metropolitan Police).
The tired old building was once described as a sh*thole, but the council's regeneration team considered it was good enough in which to decant a number of Tottenham businesses.
———
The council's rolling regeneration fiasco has many features
A tour ~ Haringey Council's factory
Muti makes a pitch for using the building as a community arts centre, Studio 101.
Was this a missed opportunity by London's Borough of Culture 2027 ?
———
Enfield Council's enforcement letters (below) are dated 17 March and are posted on the front. There seem to be compliance issues relating to The Building Act 1984 (Sections 81– 83):
.
Tags for Forum Posts: Enfield, Haringey Council, Regen, Regeneration, Shaftesbury, demolition, empty, factory, loss
We can't always undo past mistakes.
But we can try to learn lessons from them.
As Clive Carter explains in his video commentary and here, the losses on 3 Shaftesbury Road. Enfield are part of several dubious past property dealings within Haringey around the same time period.
Were lessons learned? I don't know. I hope I'm wrong, but I very much doubt it.
One obvious question for the future is whether sufficient changes were made which would prevent similar serious mistakes and misjudgements being made again.
Clive Carter deserves Haringey's thanks for shooting and editing this video, on his own personal equipment.
He also undertook the major part of the work digging out information. Several other people contributed to the project. I am proud to have been one of them.
© 2026 Created by Hugh.
Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh