Just seen the banner and my opinion is that its pretty damn crap.
Why?
You still see much of the shoddy paintwork on the bridge.
The banner is all wrinkled.
The overall design is so crap.
I could go on but I'll give everyone else chance instead.
Oh well.
Tags for Forum Posts: glsg, harringay banner, harringay bridge
Thanks for your response
So baisicly ther was some money left over to get a banner to cover a bridge many people did not want covering.
As there was not much money and not much time and a very naff banner was chosen to cover a beautifil if somwhet shoddy bridge that a significan number of peole did not want covered. in order to have this bridege covered for later years advertising space which no wanted used as advertising space was sold to at least one business with rather dubious past of blighting Harringay with illegal advertising.
Would it not have been a better idea for the excess money just to have been swallowed up by LBoH, at the end of the finacial year, put back into the borough elsewhere and we have no banner and no advertising at all.
I appreciate there are cuts but that is no excuse for LBoH to pimp out landmarks for corporate sponsorship.
Why not have our Parks dyed with a Subway Logo, parking enforcemnet officers can be sponsored by Yassir Halim, whilst the mayoral car can have Lido as it livery.
Where will this stop?
And why was no one offerd the opprtunity to adopt the bridge?
Zena. Roughly how many residents make up the GLSC?
I appreciate that it's in the eye of the beholder, but not sure I'd call the Harringay Bridge "beautiful" even if it were bannerless, graffiti free, painted and in better nick (it's got at least one leak that dripped rusty water on my shoulder when stuck in traffic underneath it the other day).
Suppose it could technically be described as a "landmark", given that it's quite large, but I'm not sure any tourist board would seek to define our area's USP through the medium of a bog-standard London railway bridge.
Zena, thank you for replying. I am really worried about this line though:
"a small budget for the banner which had to be used by the end of the financial year. To make sure we didn't lose the money..."
Who is 'we'? Where would the money have gone?
The money would have been swallowed up buy LBoh and used for other causes not necessarily for Harringay.
Perhaps for a specialist teaching assistant to visit a school to do a few days 1 to 1 training with a new TA who needs support working with a young child on the autistic spectrum.
Perhaps to fill a pothole,
Perhaps to by resources for a day centre.
Perhaps Books for a library
Perhaps a youth worker for a while
Perhaps a new seat for a swing
Perhaps a bin for a park
Perhaps a dog wardens uniform (do they wear a uniform?)
Perhaps overtime for social workers,
Perhaps Coffee for an ESOL group
Perhaps Council ID badges
a camera for an enforcement officer
Perhaps post-it notes, tape and staples
Perhaps to wine and dine local business to hear what haringey landmarks they would like to advertise on.
Who knows.
This is ridiculous - you are saying that we have to have a banner so you can have an income to pay for a future banner. How often do we have to say it ? - we don't want a banner, any banner, ever.
Here's another way of looking at this situation. I did a quick Google Street View survey of all Haringey's railway bridges WITHOUT advertising and those WITH advertising.
I guess we should feel special.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh