Haringey spending

The following sentences are taken from Haringey accounts for the years 2006/7, 2007/8, 2008/9, 2009/10 respectively. I.e. for years which were completed before the May 2010 elections, i.e. before any ConDem cuts were implemented

"In  2006/07 the Authority planned net expenditure of £365.9 million, as set out in the following table. "

 "!In 2007/08 the Authority planned net expenditure of £382 million, as set out in the
following table:"

 "In 2008/09 the Authority planned net expenditure of £398 million, as set out in the
following table:"

"In 2009/10 the Council planned net expenditure of £242.7 million, as set out in the following table:"

£150+ million seems to have been "saved" from 8/9 to 9/10?

This line is taken from the budget for 2010-11 , at which point the £150million (and a little more) has reappeared.

 ______________________________2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11
 _______________________________£'000 __£'000 ___ £'000 __£'000_ £'000  __   £'000    £'000    £'000
Expenditure Haringey Council (LBH) 308,159_327,552_345,929_ 366,511_384,602_399,578_408,833_416,587 

The difference is accounted for almost entirely by the children and young people budget.

I wonder why this should have happened?