All foreigners need deporting
… is alleged to have been posted by Haringey Councillor Sheila Peacock in a WhatsApp Group.
Today, the Haringey Community Press reported that Cllr Peacock has been suspended by Labour after deport foreigners message.
Sheila Peacock is no stranger to ill-considered statements.
As the Mayor of Haringey several times, would Cllr Peacock not have officiated at UK naturalisation ceremonies at the Civic Centre?
Sheila Peacock is a Labour candidate for South Tottenham in the May 2026 local elections, but one has to wonder if she would not feel more at home in the Party of Nigel Farage.
Tags for Forum Posts: "Sheila, , ., Council, Haringey, , Haringey Council, Mayor, Mayor", Sheila Peacock, former Mayor
1. I love that "proof" below. It's as specious as all of Clive "Jimmy" Carter's facts and arguments all over these pages. One can only have one name on WhatsApp at any given time. So either Peacock has two phone numbers and two accounts ("Cllr Sheila Peacock" and "Sheila Peacock") or the evidence is as bogus as her ostensibly deleting something as admin at the top but then asking how to delete something at the bottom. Also, a deleted message notification on WA doesn't look like that. There is a tilda before the administrator's name. It also says above that whose message was deleted and that person's phone number.
Amateurs. Your seething Leftist rage and hatred blind you to the obvious. When I was managing editor of my university paper there was a letter to the editor that was designed to trick us into publishing it as its content would have humiliated us. It was signed "Jonathan Swift" which I appreciated as a nice touch: At least the Marxist professors who tried to sucker my editor and I into publishing that letter back then still had decent educations because they learned from the Greatest Generation. I doubt that generation would have bothered to fight WWII if they knew what would then happen to their country at the hands of their descendants.
2. My advice: stay away from Arsebook and What'scrap. I'm glad we finally agree on something. Although I don't really see much difference between posting rubbish in those places versus on this site.
3. Personally I would be delighted to leave. It's not the Britain I came to know and love through literature and music growing up in my foreign city. But I want the millions I've paid in taxes back with interest to make it so people like the main posters here don't have to work and can sit around and make toxic this site (and presumably elsewhere) day in day out.
How on earth did you manage to pay "millions in taxes" here? Did you perhaps overtrust your personal accounts to Mr Ebenezer? in the English scribbling you favoured. Surely you realised his firm were grossly understaffed by fictional ghosts?
And please let us all know if you are truly returning in delight to your foreign city. All us work averse MarxLamists can at long last enjoy relinquishing the task of toxifying this site as you demand.
Despite the moral panic around young people's use of social media and LLMs, this post and the subsequent discussion suggest it's the boomers and Silent Generation who are struggling to cope. No one under 30 is in any doubt about what happened here.
I’m 66 so you’ll need to explain it to me.
I've been listening today to some of BBC radio 4 special programs on how scammers trick us. Including the very suave and polished ways scammers may steal our money and take most advantage of vulnerable people. Scammers are using techniques to get sometimes even sensible and cautious people to hand over critical online information. Including getting them to install software (malware). They had people on the radio programme who described their rapidly rising panic, and feelings of shame when they realised they'd been tricked.
And worse Scammers might expose some of their victims to cruel enjoyment and sometimes vicious feelings of triumph when they'd got online victims at their mercy.
The offensive words attributed - I hope falsely to Sheila Peacock - I want the Labour Party to investigate swiftly and reliably. And get to the bottom of this.
I was an elected councillor for sixteen years. During that time I was given confidential family and business information by residents. This included for example, taking up complaints and other issues which were important to residents I represented. I also sat on appeal panels for staff, when I had access to confidential personal files. There are legal consequences to councillors' decisions.
Hurtful thoughtless racist off-the-cuff remarks are important to challenge. Whoever posted this one should not be a candidate for any progressive political party.
Sometimes the most obvious explanation is correct ie.an old lady, not particularly apt with a modern phone, posts a message meant for one group of people to another group whose members hold very different views to the first group and thus upsets them. Surely that's more likely than Evil Elon or the FSB or whoever else 'hacking' into her phone.
And more importantly, does it matter? Who cares what is said in private conversations? No laws were broken. She's not inciting violence or planning a bank robbery.
© 2025 Created by Hugh.
Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh