Tags for Forum Posts: traffic, wightman bridge, wightman bridge closure
I think that this might be partly Ian's point.
I interpret that 15-20 years ago, some other area changed and pushed traffic into GL/WR. This is petty and nimby to the extreme. And yet, all we can seem to propose is: let's do the same and push the traffic to someone else's back yard.
For me it's Hewit's no-right-turn all over again, only on a greater scale. And sod the residents at Beresford and Fairfax.
15 years of living in London and I still struggle with the concept that London operates 33 town halls with opposing views one to the other and no consolidated vision.
I lack faith in any positive outcome.
Everyone else, east and west of us, who lives in a residential road that is a potential rat-run, has had something done about it. Directly north of us the North Circular is a mess and many people get off just before it gets messy and continue into London from there.
And the real killer -> IT'S ONLY FOR FIVE MONTHS!!!!!
Indeed. 20 years ago London had ~1.5 million fewer inhabitants.
For inner london, it was rougly at it's historical nadir since 1891 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inner_London)
All transport modalities in London are cramped at peak times. Even walking.
Volume makes all the difference - there's only so much capacity in the (road) network, regardless of traffic management.
No wonder things are worse.
Michael, to explain, I am talking about a bigger picture of logic. some on WR and ladders may want the road closed forever. Some on WR & ladders may want the road re-opened. A greater number of people using the road who do not reside on WR or ladders would want it re-opened. Greater good of society.
Ian, you are accepting that the current state is the only possible way things can be. The purpose of the study that has started is to find another way of handling traffic that uses the area as a whole and that of course includes the Ladder.
In the 30 odd years I've lived here my perception and that of others living here is that traffic flows have increased year on year in the area. Over the last three decades people living locally have stood on street corners counting cars, set up their own traffic counters, lobbied Haringey and their councillors (you may have read individual actions people have taken over the years to try and improve things in other posts). But things have only deteriorated.
Allowing traffic to continue to build on the Ladder road, especially on Wightman Road, has meant not having to address difficult problems elsewhere, like decisions to bring about ad hoc improvements in one place without appreciating the impact on other places and not wanting to get to grips with the mess that is Green Lanes.
As for greater good; traffic can be given alternative routes, the routes traffic uses at the moment are not fixed and eternal. People cannot pick up their homes and move them. The greater good of the tens of thousands who live in the area is surely the most important consideration.
Please don't do that Michael. You're too valuable a contributor to lose
I think it boils down to a simple equation. Commuters through the area spend say 10 hours per week on their commute,some more, some less. People living in the area do so for up to 168 hours a week.
Over the past thirty years I have spent considerable amounts of money installing double glazing and replacing a glazed front door with a solid one, all to try and reduce the noise coming into my home. I don't open the windows at the front of the house, even in summer, as the noise sometimes is unbearable. I have done everything I can. Maybe now it's time for motorists to do their bit.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh