After it was discovered at the St Ann's Labour Party selection candidate selection meeting that there were people present and voting who should not have been, I came home from the pub (where I'd heard about it) and wrote this article. It has subsequently been edited by site admins to remove the names of people who were embarrassed or in the final case where a journalist said it was potentially libellous. Well here I will attempt to summarise what we have subsequently found out and hopefully take people's attention away from my original appalling rant.
*An individual has asked that their name be replaced with their function in this post on the grounds that they are not seeking public office. This has been done.
Tags for Forum Posts: election2014, labour, st ann's labour, stanns
Sorry to read of your nervousness about posting on HoL, Ceri, but perhaps not surprised. As is the case on most forums, some authors are far more robust than they need to be. We deal with the most serious issues, but for the rest, it seems to be rather the nature of the beast, I'm afraid,
Reply by John McMullan 15 hours ago
"Start your own thread if you're so inclined".
Thanks for that suggestion John, I just might do that, but perhaps a bit nearer to the election to remind voters what the politicians 'actually' do for the people who pay their wages.....in my case not a lot, and the person concerned is Dave Browne !
Well he's been deselected in #stanns, so don't waste your time.
It's come to my attention that Haringey Labour were aware of mass entryism in the borough of the kind seen in St Ann's ward as far back as July last year with none other than Alan Olive urging wards to take action and clarifying the freeze dates. This was seen as an especially bad problem in Seven Sisters, Northumberland Park and West Green. It was dealt with appropriately in every ward in the borough (as far as I am aware) but certainly not in St Ann's.
John, I hadn't spotted this particular bit of information. Nor realised the implications. I did hear that at one time Kober and others were trying to bring forward the "Freeze Date" for members being eligible to take part in candidate selection by ward branches. But it seems that Alan Olive at the London Regional Office sensibly said 'no'. (If only he'd been equally sensible since then.)
Plainly it's going to be a large task turning all this into a short pamphlet version (both downloadable and paper) so every St Ann's elector and anyone with internet access, can read details of what happened. But that's clearly essential if voters are to go to the poll having an opportunity to get accurate facts.
Are the apparatchiks at Labour's London Regional office still following you on Twitter? I assume they've noticed the steady increase in hits on HoL. Right now 26,000+
Vaneska, we have many Labour-voting friends in Crouch End and other wards in Hornsey Wood Green whose confidence in the Labour Party has been shaken by the party's failure to tackle vote-rigging in St Ann's. I particularly regret how the Party's duplicity in excusing and covering it up, now risks damaging the electoral prospects of some excellent candidates.
In your Crouch End ward, I don't yet know about Labour candidate Natan Doron. But I'm hearing good things about Jason Arthur. I do know Lourdes Keever and she was also shortlisted in our own Tottenham Hale ward. Lourdes will make an outstanding councillor. I recommend her without reservation.
My strong recommendation to anyone wondering who to vote for is to refuse to take part in the silly nonsense of doorstep "voter ID". It's a condescending, scripted, tick-box game; mandated by robotic party apparatchiks.
Instead, insist on speaking directly to a candidate you're thinking of voting for. There are 118 days left which is time enough. Sit them down. If the candidate can't give you say, 15 or 20 minutes for a grown-up conversation about real issues then don't waste your vote.
(Tottenham Hale ward councillor 1998-2014)
After a couple of years of sitting through many ward meetings, I have realised that all that matters is the last year of every term, especially the month up to the cutoff date. Then it all gets packed - entryism everywhere. I'm sure this has happened since the dinosaurs gave up in despair.
One interesting exercise would be to look at membership graphs through the electoral cycle, if any such records are ever kept.
Falkirk just did what they all do. So did StAnns, they just blew it on the day. £40-odd a year is a lot to keep paying if you're only needed for ten minutes.
I live in Crouch End where Labour have been putting some effort (more than I remember previously) into sticking questionnaires through our doors with pointed questions asking us to tell them anything that might be bothering us, and also doorstepping quite thoroughly - scenting the chance to remove Lynne Featherstone, I guess. Having missed me before, they managed to collar me tonight and I told them that as a natural Labour voter but with minimal interest in the political machine, the one big thing that was making me reconsider was the St Anns Ward issue. The guy didn't pretend not to understand exactly what I was getting at and clearly agreed that it was a big problem that touches on everyone. To my surprise he told me that I was the first person on a doorstep who had mentioned this issue to him. I assured him that people may not have mentioned it but not to imagine that people around here aren't reconsidering their votes.
v
I lived in Crouch End for over twenty years, in the days of Sir Hugh Rossi! What you say about voters thinking is true. Some of us, myself included, have already made it clear we will not vote for the Labour Party in St Anns Ward because of theis scandal. The local labour party have lost our confidence because of this and I do not see them upping the anti to get things back on track They will get what they deserve if there is any justice in this world.
I HOPE that the Labour Party will examine more carefully the reports of fraud in the selection of their St. Ann's Ward candidates.
The shady dealings described, would have required pre-meditation – apparently, now followed by a cover-up. Is the local leadership involved?
It tends to give all politics a bad name. It's surprising that the official candidates – who've been selected in such circumstances – are content to begin their political careers with the appearance of taint. The people behind this know who they are. They ought to examine their consciences. Do they not understand that the matters to which they are connected will not go away?
The Labour Party has allowed this to fester for more than three months.
Do these characters appreciate that in the Internet age, these associations – to what appears be electoral fraud – will remain, able to trawled up indefinitely?
I hope that David Lammy MP might lead in sorting this out: it would demonstrate principles.
The dearest wish of the perpetrators is that this would all go away and be forgotten ASAP.
Congratulations to John McMullan for his fight to clean this up. Happy to yield the title of most-ever-viewed thread (26,000 and climbing) to a fellow Kiwi ...
Im surprised the Lib-dems aren't making more of this.
Perhaps, but the Lib-Dems should be going for the jugular. They love getting news out about Labour's failings, but have been pretty damn silent on this matter. It makes me wonder if the others have one or two skeletons in closets as well.
I hope it's no worse than festering. Clive. Because with proper treatment, a suppurating wound can be healed.
Did you see the Independent's story on the row about Tory MP Anne McIntosh being deselected in Thirsk and Malton? There are allegations - as the independent puts it - that "local activists played fast and loose with party rules in their determination to sack their sitting MP".
I think that "playing fast and loose with party rules" would be an accurate if over-polite way to describe what happened in St Ann's. One difference is that the Tories' rules now stipulate a postal ballot for all the members of the Thirsk & Malton Constituency.
The Labour Party doesn't have such a procedure for its ward branch selections. But it would be fascinating if it did. Not least because they'd face the problem of where to send the ballot forms of all the "members" who live outside the ward.
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh