Residents asked me to follow up the issue with the speed hump/service cover and resulting loss of oil from vehicles which (having driven too fast over it) leave a trail of oil.
Here is the response. The replacement cover should fix the issue but of course the larger problem of cars speeding down our roads continues. Its an issue I will continue to address with the council.
----------------------------
Your enquiry about the Statutory Undertakers service cover in Hewitt Road outside no’40 LBH/2953114
Thank you for your enquiry.
A site inspection has confirmed that the speed hump has been constructed to the correct specification and conforms to the Highways (Road Hump) Regulations 1996, which is laid down by the Department for Transport. The speed at which you approach the hump should take account of the roads layout. The Highway Code states that 'the speed limit is the absolute maximum and does not mean it is safe to drive at that speed irrespective of conditions. Driving at speeds that are inappropriate for the road and traffic conditions can be dangerous'.
However, it would appear that the cause of the problem is likely to be the protruding sewer inspection chamber near the speed hump outside no’40.
We will therefore ascertain who is responsible for this cover and request that they arrange replacement for a more modern style cover that will be flush with the carriageway when installed.
Engineering Projects Team
Project Engineer
Sustainable Transport Group
London Borough of Haringey
Tags (All lower case. Use " " for multiple word tags):
When the majority Labour group claim the hard work of local libdem councillors as their own because they are the majority they can take stuff like this too. No sympathy.
And in front of the left hand sign you can see the spray paint marking on the asphalt, hopefully where the hump will be resited.
Thanks for pics Clive.
For a minor adjustment (moving a hump a few metres, if that's what's planned) to an existing traffic calming scheme, no I don't think so. Another example - when our road had replacement street lamps installed, in different locations to previously, there was no consultation that I recall.
I THINK that, having Gone and Seen, the signs and placement ought to be dramatic enough to cause even enthusiastic drivers to exercise caution (I suggested a warning sign only 18 days ago – near top of thread). I also think we will all be interested in the responses to Alan's list of good questions, raised as an FoI request.
Thanks again, Karen. For people who haven't spotted it, there's a bit more of an update from John D on this thread.
Thanks Karen and everyone else who has kept chipping away at Haringey to get this done. Great to see it sorted.
© 2025 Created by Hugh.
Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh