Tags for Forum Posts: alexandra park, horse-riding, parks, riding
I will come to the meeting, I think it sounds like a very interesting proposition.
I have indeed considered Lordship Rec.
As a matter of fact, some of you may know me because I have run the pony rides at the Lordship Rec festival for the past four or five years. This is one of the things we have to discuss at the meeting but the fact is that while Lordship Rec is one regular piece of land which is used fairly evenly throughout and will have to be divided up and fenced off to provide accommodation for the animals, Alexandra Park has a discrete section which is isolated from the rest of the green space and deserted most of the time. For that reason it makes the most sense to start there.
Another option for a site would be part of the Lea Valley park which has acres of space. It is also true that there are tracts of land in Haringey which are unused, ignored -- and hidden. Not so long ago a sharp-eyed woman found a whole meadow behind where the Hornsey hospital used to be. It was owned by the NHS, who had forgotten all about it. She started a process of leasing it as a nature reserve. If someone comes to the Salisbury meeting with a piece of land like that, that would be best of all. ...Anyone for Google?
My ambition is to further the idea that equestrian centres have so many benefits to the community, education, health, recreation, ecology and, crucially, jobs, that Haringey will end up with at least two equestrian centres, possibly specialising in different types of riding. However that is for the future and we have to start somewhere.
It's a great suggestion and I wish you well with it.
But... is tennis a sport primarily for boys? I really think it's one of the better sports in terms of gender neutrality. And football has improved a lot - plenty of girls play football at my daughter's primary school, Tottenham Hotspur have an excellent junior ladies' squad and Chestnut Park is host Saturday morning classes for girls and boys. If cricket is still seen as boys-only then that needs to be addressed by the sport's governing body - there's no practical reason why girls can't play it well. And golf's inbuilt sexism is down to the social side of golf clubs being men-only clubs in the past.
This is in no way meant as a criticism of what you're doing - far from it, I think it's great. I'm a fairly hardline feminist in most respects - and I agree that equestrian sports have a particularly strong appeal for girls. But FWIW, I'd put the focus on extending opportunity - for boys and girls - rather than criticising the current provision of sports opportunities for girls.
I'm not criticising.
What I am doing is pointing out that while experts keep saying that girls and women don't do enough to keep fit, the sport that attracts women and girls in the highest numbers is the very one that is regarded as the least worthy of public support.
It is true that there are girls in every sport, but by the time they grow up they have a tendency to abandon it. Riding is the exception. There are 4 million riders in the UK, 80 percent of them female (BHS statistic). These are all participants, rather than spectators. The next sport down with the most players is rugby, with a quarter of a million participants (also a BHS statistic).
If the world made any sense, then, there would be more 16 times more riding facilities than rugby fields.
OK. I know the world doesn't make sense.
OK. I know the world doesn't make sense
Tell me about it...
And you've made your case really well - I take your point.
(I didn't think you were criticising, btw, my comment was just about the emphasis/ approach. And I didn't mean to sound like I was criticising your plans either)
Are you aware of thisStakeholder's Forum?
© 2024 Created by Hugh. Powered by
© Copyright Harringay Online Created by Hugh