Harringay online

Harringay, Haringey - So Good they Spelt it Twice!

Did you Hear about the Dramatic Increase in Speeding Fines this April?

Somehow this one passed me by. In case I'm not teh only one I thought I'd share.

Currently the minimum penalty you can expect to receive for speeding is a £100 fine and 3 penalty points added to your licence, but from April 24, 2017, magistrates in England and Wales have been directed to apply banded speeding fines for the most serious offenders.

Band A speeding fine

A Band A speeding fine would be appropriate if you are caught speeding between 31-40 in a 30mph zone, and you can expect to receive a fine equivalent to 50% of your weekly income (£240), and 3 penalty points on your driving licence.

By way of comparison, the average speeding fine handed out in 2015 was just £188.

Band B speeding fine

You might receive a Band B speeding fine for doing between 41-50mph, in which case you'd face a fine equivalent to 100% of your weekly income (£480), and 4 penalty points on your driving licence, or disqualification from driving for up to 28 days.

Band C speeding fine

A Band C speeding fine means that anyone speeding at 51mph or above in a 30mph limit - for example - faces a fine equivalent to 150% of their weekly income, and 6 penalty points on their driving licence, or disqualification from driving for up to 56 days. If you’re disqualified for 56 days or more you must apply for a new licence before you're able to start driving again.

For anyone earning £25,000 a year, a speeding fine equivalent to 150% of their weekly income means handing over a minimum of £720 - no small amount.

Summarised below:

If you get caught driving at a speed that will land you with a Band B or C speeding fine, the magistrates may believe your speeding is too serious for penalty points. In this case, you may be disqualified from driving for a period of time instead of being given penalty points.

Magistrates are instructed to take any mitigating or aggravating factors into account. A mitigating factor, like speeding because of an emergency, for example, and receiving a Band C fine, could see the speeding ticket reduced to 125% of the driver’s weekly income.

However, the presence of an aggravating factor could see a Band C speeding fine rise to as much as 175%. Aggravating factors include things like being a persistent offender or speeding while towing a trailer or a caravan.

All the fines can only be levied by the police, but in some areas residents are working with the local police force running a Community Speedwatch programmes, as they do in Haringey.

Views: 2262

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Mitigating circumstances will involve the driver having the same model motor vehicle as the magistrate. The system is utterly rigged in favour of the speeding drivers.

Can anyone tell me what model car the local magistrate has?

;)

What's healthy is to see the adoption of the Finnish model where people are fined a percentage of their income. Whilst everyone's circumstances will be different, it seems a fairer system than a blanket fixed amount which hurts poor people more

I'm in favour of a system which has the ability to levy a penalty on the maximum number of actors. If that means a disproportionally heavier fine on so called 'poor' people, because they represent the vast majority of motorists, then that's right. I would be of the same view if the majority of the population where 'rich' or whatever that's supposed to mean.

It wasn't hurting poor people less, it was hurting rich people less. They're after the trader types in their Ferraris who earn £500K a year and regularly do 30 mph in Islington's 20 zones (like half of HoL probably). Who it won't hurt are the thugs who do 50-60mph up Green Lanes from Colina Rd to Duckett's Common and don't seem to have jobs with an easily discernible income.

I would take 1 Ferrari owner speeding over 99 fiesta owners.

Much more chance of 99 cars killing someone by driving too fast than one. You're just being envious. As I said, the thugs up and down Green Lanes are the ones we need to stop.

And the ones on St Ann's Road.

The point is that from a financial deterrent point of view, having a fine related to someone's income is more likely to have an equal impact. A£30 fine means nothing to a person who literally has money to burn

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/cambridge-university... 

I reckon it should be proportionate to the value of the car, irrespective of income. You might have a pensioner driving a Porsche for instance.
Unlikely.

Not only heard about it - I actually got done on the day the rules changed, doing 25 instead of 20 on the Lea Bridge Road! But luckily I was offered a speed training course instead of points: still cost £100 though. Two thirds of people in the room had got caught on the same 200m section of road as me, and most of the rest on Green Lanes!

I think it would be better if everywhere was 20mph in London, as at the moment roads change randomly along their length, depending on who they 'belong' to - local borough or TfL. Palace Gates to Turnpike Lane is a case in point.

RSS

Advertising

© 2024   Created by Hugh.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service